How many cache misses will result from the following code? Assume that N is a multiple of the cache line size w, that the cache is a fully associative LRU cache of size N*w, and that both arrays’ initial addresses are at the start of a cache line.

123456
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
  for (int j = 0; j < N; j++) {
    A[i] += B[i][j];
  }
}



N^2/w + N/w



N/w



N^2 + N



N^2


Status: [object Object]
1 point


Let's break down the problem step by step.

### Code Summary:
You have two arrays `A[]` and `B[][]`. The outer loop (`i` loop) goes over the array `A`, and the inner loop (`j` loop) accesses elements of the `B[i][]` array. For each iteration of `i`, the entire row of `B[i][]` is traversed and its elements are accumulated into `A[i]`.

### Cache Parameters:
- The cache is fully associative with Least Recently Used (LRU) replacement policy.
- The size of the cache is \(N \times w\) (where \(w\) is the cache line size, and \(N\) is a multiple of \(w\)).
- Both arrays `A` and `B` start at the beginning of a cache line.

### Cache Misses:

1. **Accessing `A[i]`**:
   - `A[i]` is accessed in every iteration of the outer loop.
   - Since the size of `A[]` is \(N\) and the cache is fully associative, once `A[i]` is accessed, it remains in the cache if there’s enough space.
   - If the cache line size \(w\) can fit multiple `A[i]` elements in one line (which is common), the number of cache misses from accessing `A[i]` is approximately \(N / w\).

2. **Accessing `B[i][j]`**:
   - For each value of `i`, the entire row `B[i][]` of size \(N\) is traversed.
   - Assuming that a row of `B` spans across multiple cache lines, and \(w\) elements fit into each cache line, we will have a cache miss for every cache line that hasn’t been loaded yet.
   - There will be approximately \(N / w\) cache misses for each iteration of the inner loop over \(j\), and this happens for every value of `i` in the outer loop.
   - Therefore, the total number of cache misses for the array `B[i][j]` is approximately \(N \times (N / w) = N^2 / w\).

### Total Cache Misses:
- Cache misses from accessing `A[i]` ≈ \(N / w\).
- Cache misses from accessing `B[i][j]` ≈ \(N^2 / w\).

Thus, the total number of cache misses is approximately:
\[
\frac{N^2}{w} + \frac{N}{w}.
\]

This matches your given option: **\(\frac{N^2}{w} + \frac{N}{w}\)**.

### Conclusion:
The total number of cache misses is **\(\frac{N^2}{w} + \frac{N}{w}\)**.

---

Do you want more details or have any questions?

### Follow-up Questions:
1. How does the cache line size affect the number of cache misses?
2. What is the difference between a fully associative cache and a direct-mapped cache in terms of cache misses?
3. How would the number of cache misses change if we used a direct-mapped cache instead of a fully associative cache?
4. Can prefetching techniques reduce the number of cache misses in this code?
5. How would a different loop order (i.e., switching the inner and outer loops) affect cache performance?

#### Tip:
Improving data locality in your code can significantly reduce cache misses and improve overall performance.

How many cache misses will result from the following code? Assume that N is a multiple of the cache line size w, that the cache is a fully associative LRU cache of size N*w, and that both arrays’ initial addresses are at the start of a cache line.

for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
  for (int j = 0; j < N; j++) {
    A[i] += B[i][j];
  }
}


Explore the number of cache misses in a nested loop computation with a fully associative LRU cache. This problem covers key concepts in cache memory, computational complexity, and data locality. Suitable for computer science undergraduates.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation