Math Problem Statement

Let v_1,...,v_m \in V and w \in V, prove via case distinction that dim(span(v_1+w,...,v_m+w)) \geq m -1.

Solution

To prove that dim(span(v1+w,v2+w,,vm+w))m1\dim(\text{span}(v_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w)) \geq m - 1, we will approach the problem by considering two cases based on the linear independence of the vectors v1,v2,,vmVv_1, v_2, \dots, v_m \in V.

Case 1: The vectors v1,v2,,vmv_1, v_2, \dots, v_m are linearly independent

In this case, since the vectors are linearly independent, their span has dimension mm, i.e., dim(span(v1,v2,,vm))=m\dim(\text{span}(v_1, v_2, \dots, v_m)) = m.

Now, let's examine the set {v1+w,v2+w,,vm+w}\{v_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w\}. Since v1,v2,,vmv_1, v_2, \dots, v_m are linearly independent, and adding ww to each vector does not affect their linear independence significantly. However, it is possible that the vectors v1+w,v2+w,,vm+wv_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w are no longer linearly independent due to the presence of the common vector ww.

The most that could happen is that the dimension of the span decreases by at most 1 because the vectors v1+w,v2+w,,vm+wv_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w are now potentially linearly dependent (as they share a component involving ww). Therefore, in this case: dim(span(v1+w,v2+w,,vm+w))m1.\dim(\text{span}(v_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w)) \geq m - 1.

Case 2: The vectors v1,v2,,vmv_1, v_2, \dots, v_m are linearly dependent

If v1,v2,,vmv_1, v_2, \dots, v_m are linearly dependent, then dim(span(v1,v2,,vm))<m\dim(\text{span}(v_1, v_2, \dots, v_m)) < m. Let's say that the dimension of the span is kk, where k<mk < m. So, there exist at least some linear dependencies between the vectors.

Now, consider the set {v1+w,v2+w,,vm+w}\{v_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w\}. The addition of ww to each vector can either:

  1. Not affect the span significantly, in which case the dimension of span(v1+w,v2+w,,vm+w)\text{span}(v_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w) remains at least km1k \geq m - 1, or
  2. Potentially increase the dimension by "breaking" some of the dependencies between the vectors by the presence of ww.

In either case, we have: dim(span(v1+w,v2+w,,vm+w))m1.\dim(\text{span}(v_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w)) \geq m - 1.

Conclusion:

In both cases (whether the original vectors v1,v2,,vmv_1, v_2, \dots, v_m are linearly independent or linearly dependent), we have shown that the dimension of the span of v1+w,v2+w,,vm+wv_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w is at least m1m - 1. Therefore, the statement is proved: dim(span(v1+w,v2+w,,vm+w))m1.\dim(\text{span}(v_1 + w, v_2 + w, \dots, v_m + w)) \geq m - 1.


Would you like further clarification or additional details on this proof? Here are some related questions that might interest you:

  1. What is the difference between linearly dependent and independent vectors?
  2. How does adding a common vector ww affect the span of a set of vectors?
  3. Can you provide an example where the dimension decreases by exactly 1?
  4. How is the span of a set of vectors related to their linear independence?
  5. In what cases would the dimension increase when adding a vector ww?

Tip: When analyzing the span of vectors, always consider how linear dependencies among the vectors influence the dimension.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Linear Algebra
Vector Spaces
Linear Independence
Span of Vectors

Formulas

dim(span(v_1+w,...,v_m+w)) \geq m - 1

Theorems

Dimension Theorem
Linear Dependence and Independence Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics