Math Problem Statement

Directions(Q6-10):- In these questions the

relationship between different elements is

shown in the statements, Give answer

1)Only conclusion I follows.

2)Only conclusion II follows.

3)Either I or II follows.

4)Neither I nor II follows.

5)Both conclusion I and II follows

Q6:-Statements:- A ≥ F=E, D <G ≤ E, D>P

Conclusions:-

I E ≥ A

II. A>P

Q7:-Statements:- B>T<Q<L,

R ≥Q,B<V

Conclusions:-

I T=R

II. R>T

Q8:-Statements:- R ≥S ≥T>U>X; T<V<W

Conclusions:-

I R>X

II. X<W

Q9:-Statements:- A>B>F>C;D>E>C

Conclusions:-

I C<D

II. A>E

Q10:-Statements:- K ≤ L ≤M=N; P ≥O ≥N

Conclusions:-

I K<P

II. K=PQ11:-Statements:- M ≥T< V; U<V< X; Z≥ Y ≥X

Conclusions:-

I. T<Z

II. U<Y

III.M>X

IV.M ≥ X

Q12:-Statements:-W≤A≤K=N;D≤A≤U=L;G>L

Conclusions:-

I. W<G

II. U≥W

III.D≥N

IV.A≤N

Q13:Statements:N<T≤O;F>N≥E=I>R;R≥Y

Conclusions:-

I. Y<O

II. T<F

III.T≥F

IV.R<O

Solution

Let's analyze each question step by step.

Q6:

Statements:

  • A ≥ F = E
  • D < G ≤ E
  • D > P

Conclusions:

  1. E ≥ A
  2. A > P

Analysis:

  • From the first statement, AF=EA \geq F = E, this implies AEA \geq E but not necessarily EAE \geq A. Therefore, conclusion I (E ≥ A) does not follow.
  • From the second and third statements, D>PD > P and D<GED < G \leq E, there is no direct relationship between A and P, so we cannot conclude that A > P. Thus, conclusion II does not follow.

Answer: 4) Neither I nor II follows.

Q7:

Statements:

  • B > T < Q < L
  • R ≥ Q
  • B < V

Conclusions:

  1. T = R
  2. R > T

Analysis:

  • From RQ>TR \geq Q > T, RR could be greater than or equal to TT, but there's no certainty that T=RT = R or R>TR > T. Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II can be definitively drawn.

Answer: 4) Neither I nor II follows.

Q8:

Statements:

  • R ≥ S ≥ T > U > X
  • T < V < W

Conclusions:

  1. R > X
  2. X < W

Analysis:

  • From the first statement RST>U>XR ≥ S ≥ T > U > X, clearly R>XR > X. So, conclusion I follows.
  • From the second statement T<V<WT < V < W and the first statement U>XU > X, we can infer X<WX < W. So, conclusion II follows as well.

Answer: 5) Both conclusion I and II follow.

Q9:

Statements:

  • A > B > F > C
  • D > E > C

Conclusions:

  1. C < D
  2. A > E

Analysis:

  • From the second statement D>E>CD > E > C, it is clear that C<DC < D. So, conclusion I follows.
  • From the first statement A>B>F>CA > B > F > C and the second statement D>E>CD > E > C, since A>B>F>CA > B > F > C and D>E>CD > E > C, but we have no direct relationship between A and E, we cannot conclude that A>EA > E. So, conclusion II does not follow.

Answer: 1) Only conclusion I follows.

Q10:

Statements:

  • K ≤ L ≤ M = N
  • P ≥ O ≥ N

Conclusions:

  1. K < P
  2. K = P

Analysis:

  • From the first statement KLM=NK ≤ L ≤ M = N and the second statement PONP ≥ O ≥ N, PN=MLKP \geq N = M \geq L \geq K. So, PP can be greater than or equal to KK, but there's no certainty that K<PK < P or K=PK = P. Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows.

Answer: 4) Neither I nor II follows.

Summary:

  • Q6: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
  • Q7: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
  • Q8: 5) Both conclusion I and II follow.
  • Q9: 1) Only conclusion I follows.
  • Q10: 4) Neither I nor II follows.

Do you have any questions or would you like more detailed explanations?

Related Questions:

  1. How do inequalities between different variables impact the conclusions?
  2. How can we deduce conclusions when multiple statements interact?
  3. What is the importance of equivalence (e.g., ==) in logical reasoning?
  4. How does combining inequalities help in drawing conclusions?
  5. What happens if one statement contradicts another?

Tip: When analyzing inequalities, always start by arranging the elements in order to understand their relationships clearly.