Math Problem Statement
Directions(Q6-10):- In these questions the
relationship between different elements is
shown in the statements, Give answer
1)Only conclusion I follows.
2)Only conclusion II follows.
3)Either I or II follows.
4)Neither I nor II follows.
5)Both conclusion I and II follows
Q6:-Statements:- A ≥ F=E, D <G ≤ E, D>P
Conclusions:-
I E ≥ A
II. A>P
Q7:-Statements:- B>T<Q<L,
R ≥Q,B<V
Conclusions:-
I T=R
II. R>T
Q8:-Statements:- R ≥S ≥T>U>X; T<V<W
Conclusions:-
I R>X
II. X<W
Q9:-Statements:- A>B>F>C;D>E>C
Conclusions:-
I C<D
II. A>E
Q10:-Statements:- K ≤ L ≤M=N; P ≥O ≥N
Conclusions:-
I K<P
II. K=PQ11:-Statements:- M ≥T< V; U<V< X; Z≥ Y ≥X
Conclusions:-
I. T<Z
II. U<Y
III.M>X
IV.M ≥ X
Q12:-Statements:-W≤A≤K=N;D≤A≤U=L;G>L
Conclusions:-
I. W<G
II. U≥W
III.D≥N
IV.A≤N
Q13:Statements:N<T≤O;F>N≥E=I>R;R≥Y
Conclusions:-
I. Y<O
II. T<F
III.T≥F
IV.R<O
Solution
Let's analyze each question step by step.
Q6:
Statements:
- A ≥ F = E
- D < G ≤ E
- D > P
Conclusions:
- E ≥ A
- A > P
Analysis:
- From the first statement, , this implies but not necessarily . Therefore, conclusion I (E ≥ A) does not follow.
- From the second and third statements, and , there is no direct relationship between A and P, so we cannot conclude that A > P. Thus, conclusion II does not follow.
Answer: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
Q7:
Statements:
- B > T < Q < L
- R ≥ Q
- B < V
Conclusions:
- T = R
- R > T
Analysis:
- From , could be greater than or equal to , but there's no certainty that or . Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II can be definitively drawn.
Answer: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
Q8:
Statements:
- R ≥ S ≥ T > U > X
- T < V < W
Conclusions:
- R > X
- X < W
Analysis:
- From the first statement , clearly . So, conclusion I follows.
- From the second statement and the first statement , we can infer . So, conclusion II follows as well.
Answer: 5) Both conclusion I and II follow.
Q9:
Statements:
- A > B > F > C
- D > E > C
Conclusions:
- C < D
- A > E
Analysis:
- From the second statement , it is clear that . So, conclusion I follows.
- From the first statement and the second statement , since and , but we have no direct relationship between A and E, we cannot conclude that . So, conclusion II does not follow.
Answer: 1) Only conclusion I follows.
Q10:
Statements:
- K ≤ L ≤ M = N
- P ≥ O ≥ N
Conclusions:
- K < P
- K = P
Analysis:
- From the first statement and the second statement , . So, can be greater than or equal to , but there's no certainty that or . Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Answer: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
Summary:
- Q6: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
- Q7: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
- Q8: 5) Both conclusion I and II follow.
- Q9: 1) Only conclusion I follows.
- Q10: 4) Neither I nor II follows.
Do you have any questions or would you like more detailed explanations?
Related Questions:
- How do inequalities between different variables impact the conclusions?
- How can we deduce conclusions when multiple statements interact?
- What is the importance of equivalence (e.g., ) in logical reasoning?
- How does combining inequalities help in drawing conclusions?
- What happens if one statement contradicts another?
Tip: When analyzing inequalities, always start by arranging the elements in order to understand their relationships clearly.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Inequalities
Logical reasoning
Formulas
-
Theorems
-
Suitable Grade Level
High school
Related Recommendation
Logical Reasoning with Inequalities: Analyzing Statements and Conclusions
Symbolic Logic Problem: Inequalities and Truth Conclusions
Inequalities and Logical Deduction: Solving Statement and Conclusion Problems
Validating Reasoning, Consecutive Natural Numbers, and Truth Sets in Logic
Logical Reasoning Problem: Deducing True Statements from Conditional Statements