A Statement is given below followed by two 
Conclusions numbered I and II. 
Statement: J ≤ Q = F > M, S < B ≥ Z > Q, T 
> A > B ≤ W
Conclusion-I: B ≥ M 
Conclusion-II: T > Z
Which one of the following is correct in respect 
of the above Statement and the Conclusions? 
(a) Only Conclusion-I follows from the 
Statement.
(b) Only Conclusion-II follows from the 
Statement.
(c) Both Conclusion-I and conclusion-II follow 
from the Statement.
(d) Neither Conclusion-I nor conclusion-II 
follows from the Statement.

Let's break down the given statement and conclusions step by step:

### Statement Analysis:
1. **J ≤ Q = F > M**:  
   - This tells us that J is less than or equal to Q, Q is equal to F, and F is greater than M. So, we have:  
     J ≤ Q = F > M.
   
2. **S < B ≥ Z > Q**:  
   - This implies S is less than B, B is greater than or equal to Z, and Z is greater than Q. So, we have:  
     S < B ≥ Z > Q.
   
3. **T > A > B ≤ W**:  
   - This implies T is greater than A, A is greater than B, and B is less than or equal to W. So, we have:  
     T > A > B ≤ W.

### Conclusions:
**Conclusion-I: B ≥ M**  
- From the statement **J ≤ Q = F > M**, we can deduce that **B ≥ Z > Q** from the second part of the statement, but there is no direct comparison between B and M. Thus, we cannot conclusively say that **B ≥ M**.  
So, **Conclusion-I does not follow**.

**Conclusion-II: T > Z**  
- From the statement **T > A > B ≤ W** and **B ≥ Z**, we cannot definitively conclude that **T > Z** because there is no direct relation between **T** and **Z**.  
So, **Conclusion-II also does not follow**.

### Final Answer:  
**(d) Neither Conclusion-I nor Conclusion-II follows from the Statement.**

---

Would you like more details on how to analyze such problems? Or do you have any other questions?  
Here are some related questions:
1. How do you compare elements in a series of inequalities?
2. What is the method to find the transitive relations in inequalities?
3. How can you deduce a valid conclusion from a complex logical statement?
4. What is the significance of equality in comparative inequalities?
5. Can there be situations where more than one conclusion can follow from a statement?

**Tip:** When dealing with statements and conclusions in inequalities, ensure to visualize them or break them down step by step. Sometimes, a systematic approach can reveal relationships not immediately obvious!

A Statement is given below followed by two Conclusions numbered I and II. Statement: J ≤ Q = F > M, S < B ≥ Z > Q, T > A > B ≤ W. Conclusion-I: B ≥ M. Conclusion-II: T > Z. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Statement and the Conclusions? (a) Only Conclusion-I follows from the Statement. (b) Only Conclusion-II follows from the Statement. (c) Both Conclusion-I and conclusion-II follow from the Statement. (d) Neither Conclusion-I nor conclusion-II follows from the Statement.

This problem involves analyzing a set of inequalities and determining which conclusions follow logically. The solution focuses on understanding transitive relationships in inequalities. Ideal for students in Grades 8-10.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation