Math Problem Statement

Q11:-Statements:- M ≥T< V; U<V< X; Z≥ Y ≥X

Conclusions:-

I. T<Z

II. U<Y

III.M>X

IV.M ≥ X

Q12:-Statements:-W≤A≤K=N;D≤A≤U=L;G>L

Conclusions:-

I. W<G

II. U≥W

III.D≥N

IV.A≤N

Q13:Statements:N<T≤O;F>N≥E=I>R;R≥Y

Conclusions:-

I. Y<O

II. T<F

III.T≥F

IV.R<O

Q14:Statements: I≥N≥O=X;D≥J≥I=E

Conclusions:-

I. O<D

II. X=D

III.D≥N

IV.E≥X

Q15:Statements: X≥T,Z<K,K<H,F=Q,T<Z,F>H

Conclusions:-

I. T<F

II. Q > K

III.Z < F

Solution

Let's analyze each of these questions step by step.

Q11:

Statements:

  • MT<VM \geq T < V
  • U<V<XU < V < X
  • ZYXZ \geq Y \geq X

Conclusions:

  1. T<ZT < Z
  2. U<YU < Y
  3. M>XM > X
  4. MXM \geq X

Analysis:

  • From the statements MT<VM \geq T < V and ZYX>V>TZ \geq Y \geq X > V > T, it follows that T<ZT < Z, so conclusion I is true.
  • U<V<XU < V < X and ZYX>UZ \geq Y \geq X > U imply that U<YU < Y, so conclusion II is true.
  • MTM \geq T and X>V>TX > V > T, but there is no direct relationship between MM and XX that allows us to conclude M>XM > X, so conclusion III does not follow.
  • MTM \geq T and T<XT < X, MXM \geq X is possible but not certain, so conclusion IV does not follow.

Answer: 2) Only conclusion I and II follow.

Q12:

Statements:

  • WAK=NW \leq A \leq K = N
  • DAU=LD \leq A \leq U = L
  • G>LG > L

Conclusions:

  1. W<GW < G
  2. UWU \geq W
  3. DND \geq N
  4. ANA \leq N

Analysis:

  • G>L=UAWG > L = U \geq A \geq W, so W<GW < G, thus conclusion I follows.
  • U=LAWU = L \geq A \geq W, so UWU \geq W, thus conclusion II follows.
  • N=KADN = K \geq A \geq D, so DND \geq N does not follow.
  • AK=NA \leq K = N, so ANA \leq N follows.

Answer: 5) Only conclusions I, II, and IV follow.

Q13:

Statements:

  • N<TON < T \leq O
  • F>NE=I>RF > N \geq E = I > R
  • RYR \geq Y

Conclusions:

  1. Y<OY < O
  2. T<FT < F
  3. TFT \geq F
  4. R<OR < O

Analysis:

  • N<TON < T \leq O and RYR \geq Y, F>NE=I>RYF > N \geq E = I > R \geq Y, so Y<OY < O follows.
  • TO>NT \leq O > N, and F>NF > N, but no direct comparison between TT and FF, so T<FT < F does not follow, and TFT \geq F does not follow either.
  • R<OR < O could be true since RY<OR \geq Y < O, so conclusion IV follows.

Answer: 1) Only conclusions I and IV follow.

Q14:

Statements:

  • INO=XI \geq N \geq O = X
  • DJI=ED \geq J \geq I = E

Conclusions:

  1. O<DO < D
  2. X=DX = D
  3. DND \geq N
  4. EXE \geq X

Analysis:

  • DJINO=XD \geq J \geq I \geq N \geq O = X, so O<DO < D follows.
  • XX is equal to OO, but not directly equal to DD, so X=DX = D does not follow.
  • DJIND \geq J \geq I \geq N, so DND \geq N follows.
  • E=INXE = I \geq N \geq X, so EXE \geq X follows.

Answer: 3) Conclusions I, III, and IV follow.

Q15:

Statements:

  • XTX \geq T
  • Z<K<HZ < K < H
  • F=QF = Q
  • T<ZT < Z
  • F>HF > H

Conclusions:

  1. T<FT < F
  2. Q>KQ > K
  3. Z<FZ < F

Analysis:

  • F>H>K>Z>TF > H > K > Z > T, so T<FT < F follows.
  • F=QF = Q and Q>H>KQ > H > K, so Q>KQ > K follows.
  • F>H>K>ZF > H > K > Z, so Z<FZ < F follows.

Answer: 5) All conclusions I, II, and III follow.


Do you have any questions or would you like further clarification on any of the answers?

Related Questions:

  1. How does combining inequalities from different statements help in drawing conclusions?
  2. What is the significance of equality in comparison to inequalities in logical reasoning?
  3. Can multiple conclusions be true simultaneously in such logical reasoning problems?
  4. How to approach problems where multiple elements are compared indirectly?
  5. Why is it important to check if one conclusion contradicts another?

Tip: In questions involving multiple comparisons, always ensure that all relationships are carefully analyzed and consider whether any conclusions might be indirectly related.