Indeed, it's surprising but true that there are just as many rational numbers between 0 and 1 as there are counting numbers. This can be understood through a process called diagonalization, where each rational number between 0 and 1 (i.e., fractions in the form of $\frac{a}{b}$, where $a$ and $b$ are positive integers and $a < b$) can be systematically listed without missing any. One way to do this is by listing the fractions with a denominator of 1, then 2, then 3, and so on, but skipping over any fractions that are equivalent to a simpler fraction already listed (e.g., skipping $\frac{2}{4}$ because it's the same as $\frac{1}{2}$). By arranging them in this way, each fraction can be paired with a unique counting number, showing that the set of rational numbers between 0 and 1 is countable, just like the set of all counting numbers.

Examples:

1. $\frac{1}{2}$ with counting number 1.
2. $\frac{1}{3}$ with counting number 2.
3. $\frac{2}{3}$ with counting number 3.
4. $\frac{1}{4}$ with counting number 4.
5. $\frac{3}{4}$ with counting number 5.

These examples illustrate the process of counting rational numbers in a systematic way.

---

Would you like more details or have any questions?

Here are some related questions to expand on this topic:

1. How does diagonalization work in listing rational numbers?
2. What does it mean for a set to be countable or uncountable?
3. Can the concept of countability be extended to irrational numbers?
4. What is the difference between countable and uncountable infinities?
5. How does Cantor's diagonal argument relate to this counting method?

Tip: When dealing with infinite sets, it’s important to understand the distinction between countable and uncountable infinity. The set of rational numbers is countably infinite, while the set of real numbers is uncountably infinite.