Math Problem Statement

Let f be a continuous real-valued function with domain (a, b). Show that if f(r) = 0 for each rational number r in (a, b), then f(x) = 0 for all x ∈ (a, b). Which statement is sccurate. 1) We will show that f(x) = 0 for all x in ( the real - the rationals). 2) We will show that f(x) = 0 for all x in ( the real - the rationals) intersect (a,b).

Solution

Correct Statement:

The accurate statement is:

2) We will show that f(x)=0f(x) = 0 for all x(the real - the rationals)(a,b)x \in (\text{the real - the rationals}) \cap (a, b).

Explanation:

The proof leverages the fact that the rational numbers (Q\mathbb{Q}) are dense in the real numbers (R\mathbb{R}), and ff is continuous.

  • The function ff is given to satisfy f(r)=0f(r) = 0 for all rational r(a,b)r \in (a, b).
  • Since Q(a,b)\mathbb{Q} \cap (a, b) is dense in (a,b)(a, b), any real number x(a,b)x \in (a, b) can be approximated by a sequence of rational numbers {rn}\{r_n\} with rnxr_n \to x.
  • By continuity, f(x)=limnf(rn)=0f(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} f(r_n) = 0, since f(rn)=0f(r_n) = 0 for all rnr_n.

The result shows f(x)=0f(x) = 0 for all x(a,b)x \in (a, b), which includes both rational and irrational numbers. Thus, all points in the interval (a,b)(a, b), including points outside the rationals, are shown to satisfy f(x)=0f(x) = 0.

Clarification on the Statements:

  1. Statement 1 suggests that f(x)=0f(x) = 0 for all x(RQ)x \in (\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}), which is not entirely accurate because the proof is specific to the interval (a,b)(a, b).
  2. Statement 2 accurately limits the conclusion to (RQ)(a,b)(\mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}) \cap (a, b), focusing on (a,b)(a, b), which is the domain of ff.

Would you like further elaboration or help with the proof?

Follow-Up Questions:

  1. Why does the density of rationals play a crucial role in this proof?
  2. How does the continuity of ff guarantee the result for irrational points in (a,b)(a, b)?
  3. Can this result be extended to functions defined on R\mathbb{R}?
  4. What would happen if ff were not continuous?
  5. Is there a similar result for functions with domain [a,b][a, b] instead of (a,b)(a, b)?

Tip:

Remember, continuity ensures that small changes in input result in small changes in output, which is why the behavior of ff at rational points determines its behavior everywhere in (a,b)(a, b).

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Continuity of Functions
Rational Numbers
Real Numbers
Density of Rational Numbers

Formulas

f(x) = lim_{n → ∞} f(r_n)

Theorems

Continuity of Functions
Density of Rational Numbers in Real Numbers

Suitable Grade Level

Grades 11-12