Math Problem Statement

1.3.1 ([TBB, Ex. 1.6.1]). Show that a set E R is bounded if and only if there exists an r Rsuch that x<r for all x E. (Since Section 1.6 for a discussion of absolute value.)

Solution

We need to show that a set ERE \subseteq \mathbb{R} is bounded if and only if there exists some rRr \in \mathbb{R} such that x<rx < r for all xEx \in E.

Step 1: Understanding boundedness

A set EE is said to be bounded if there exists some real number MM such that:

xMfor all xE.|x| \leq M \quad \text{for all } x \in E.

This means that every element of EE lies within the interval [M,M][-M, M], ensuring that EE does not extend to infinity in either direction.

Step 2: Proving the "if" direction

Assume that there exists some rRr \in \mathbb{R} such that:

x<rfor all xE.x < r \quad \text{for all } x \in E.

This means that EE is bounded above by rr, but we also need to show that EE is bounded below.

Since EE is a subset of R\mathbb{R}, it must have an infimum (greatest lower bound). Let m=infEm = \inf E, so mxm \leq x for all xEx \in E. Since x<rx < r for all xEx \in E, we have:

mx<rfor all xE.m \leq x < r \quad \text{for all } x \in E.

Now, define M=max(m,r)M = \max(|m|, |r|). Then for all xEx \in E,

xM.|x| \leq M.

Thus, EE is bounded.

Step 3: Proving the "only if" direction

Now, assume that EE is bounded, meaning there exists some MRM \in \mathbb{R} such that:

xMfor all xE.|x| \leq M \quad \text{for all } x \in E.

This implies:

MxMfor all xE.-M \leq x \leq M \quad \text{for all } x \in E.

Taking r=M+1r = M + 1, we see that:

x<rfor all xE.x < r \quad \text{for all } x \in E.

Thus, the existence of such an rr follows, completing the proof.


Conclusion

We have shown both directions of the equivalence:

  1. If there exists rr such that x<rx < r for all xEx \in E, then EE is bounded.
  2. If EE is bounded, then there exists such an rr.

Hence, the proof is complete.


Would you like me to clarify any part?

Related Questions

  1. How is boundedness related to the concept of supremum and infimum?
  2. Can a set be bounded above but not bounded below?
  3. What is the relationship between bounded sets and compactness in R\mathbb{R}?
  4. How does this result extend to sets in higher-dimensional spaces (Rn\mathbb{R}^n)?
  5. How does this definition of boundedness relate to metric spaces?

Tip:

A set being bounded implies the existence of a finite supremum and infimum, which is useful when working with limits and convergence in analysis.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Set Theory
Real Analysis
Boundedness
Supremum
Infimum
Absolute Value

Formulas

|x| <= M for all x in E
x < r for all x in E
m = inf E

Theorems

Boundedness Theorem
Infimum and Supremum Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate (Real Analysis)