If $H_0$ (the null hypothesis) is true, the probability of making a Type I error (rejecting $H_0$ when it is actually true) is determined by the significance level ($\alpha$) chosen for the hypothesis test. This probability is the same for anyone conducting the test, as it is purely based on the statistical design rather than individual differences.

Thus, everyone conducting the test under the same conditions has an equal probability of making a Type I error, and this probability is equal to $\alpha$. For example, if $\alpha = 0.05$, there is a 5% chance of making a Type I error if $H_0$ is true.

In summary:

• The probability of a Type I error is not affected by the individual conducting the test but is instead based on the predefined significance level.
• If $H_0$ is true, anyone performing the test under the same conditions has the same likelihood ($\alpha$) of making a Type I error.

Would you like a deeper explanation on how Type I errors work, or do you have other related questions?

---

Here are some additional questions that might help deepen understanding:

1. What is the difference between Type I and Type II errors?
2. How does the significance level ($\alpha$) influence the likelihood of making a Type I error?
3. Why is it important to control the probability of a Type I error?
4. How does sample size affect Type I and Type II errors?
5. Can we ever completely eliminate the chance of a Type I error?

Tip: Adjusting $\alpha$ can help control the probability of making a Type I error, but it’s always a balance with the likelihood of making a Type II error (failing to reject a false $H_0$).