In hypothesis testing, the likelihood of committing a Type I error (also known as a "false positive") is determined by the significance level (denoted as $\alpha$) of the test.

Here’s a step-by-step explanation:

1. Type I Error Definition:

A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis ($H_0$) is true, but we incorrectly reject it. In simpler terms, it’s when we think there is an effect or difference, but in reality, there isn't.

2. Significance Level ($\alpha$):

The significance level $\alpha$ represents the probability of committing a Type I error. This is a threshold that you set before performing the hypothesis test. Common values for $\alpha$ are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10, but it can be adjusted depending on how strict or lenient you want to be about rejecting the null hypothesis.

3. How $\alpha$ Relates to Type I Error:

• If you set $\alpha = 0.05$, you are saying, "I am willing to accept a 5% chance of committing a Type I error."
• If you set $\alpha = 0.01$, you are saying, "I am willing to accept only a 1% chance of making a Type I error."

The significance level $\alpha$ defines the critical region (rejection region) in your test. If your test statistic falls in this region, you reject $H_0$; otherwise, you fail to reject it.

4. Control over Type I Error:

By adjusting $\alpha$, you control how likely you are to make a Type I error:

• A smaller $\alpha$ means you’re being more conservative about rejecting $H_0$, thus reducing the likelihood of a Type I error, but possibly increasing the chance of a Type II error (failing to reject a false null hypothesis).
• A larger $\alpha$ increases the likelihood of rejecting $H_0$, which increases the chance of a Type I error, but decreases the risk of a Type II error.

5. Practical Example:

• If you perform a hypothesis test with $\alpha = 0.05$ and obtain a p-value less than 0.05, you would reject the null hypothesis.
• The probability of making a Type I error is the probability that you would reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true, which is exactly $\alpha = 0.05$.

In Summary:

The likelihood of a Type I error is directly tied to the significance level $\alpha$ you choose for your test. The smaller $\alpha$ is, the less likely you are to make a Type I error, but the more likely you are to fail to detect an effect if one exists (Type II error).

---

Would you like a deeper dive into the relationship between Type I and Type II errors, or any other clarification? Here are some related questions:

1. What is the significance of a p-value in hypothesis testing?
2. How do you calculate the power of a hypothesis test?
3. What is a Type II error, and how does it relate to the power of a test?
4. How do you choose the right significance level for a hypothesis test?
5. What are some practical examples where reducing Type I errors is crucial?

Tip: Always check the context of your research when choosing $\alpha$, as different fields may have varying standards for acceptable error rates!