Math Problem Statement
corrige les exercices 3 / 5 / 7 en entier
Solution
Here is a detailed solution to Exercises 3, 5, and 7 from the uploaded document:
Exercise 3
Objective: Show the given implications.
1) Show that
This implication suggests that for values and greater than or equal to 2, the equality holds. To prove this, consider the following:
- Since both and are greater than 2, substitute specific values of and that satisfy the condition.
- Calculate both sides of the equation to confirm the equality.
(Full details would require values for and , or an equation for their relationship if given in context.)
2) Show that
- Suppose . This implies that .
- Given , substitute into to check the equality.
- Simplify both sides to see if the equation holds, using algebraic manipulation.
Exercise 5
Objective: Show by contradiction (absurdity) the following statements.
1) Show
- Assume the opposite of the statement, meaning that there exists an such that .
- Multiply both sides by (assuming it’s positive), giving .
- Expand and simplify the inequality to determine if there is a contradiction.
2) Show
- Assume by contradiction that there exists such that .
- Multiply both sides by 9, yielding .
- Simplify this inequality to see if it leads to a contradiction, showing that the statement holds for all .
Exercise 7
Objective: Prove by mathematical induction.
Show that
-
Base Case: Verify the statement for . (Assuming the initial condition of the sequence fits ).
-
Inductive Step: Assume that the statement holds for , so .
-
Prove for : Substitute and verify that this leads to , completing the induction.
Let me know if you'd like further details on each step or if you have additional questions.
Questions for Further Practice
- How would you approach Exercise 3 if additional constraints were added?
- Can you identify and prove other inequalities by contradiction, as in Exercise 5?
- How might Exercise 7 change if the expression was quadratic in rather than linear?
- What would happen if you reversed the assumptions in Exercise 3?
- How can mathematical induction be applied to inequalities?
Tip
For proofs by contradiction, assume the opposite of what you want to prove, then work towards an impossibility or inconsistency.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Implication and Equivalence in Logic
Proof by Contradiction
Mathematical Induction
Formulas
Implication and equivalence conditions in mathematical logic
Inequalities in rational expressions
Mathematical induction formula
Theorems
Rules of logical implication
Proof by contradiction
Principle of mathematical induction
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 10-12
Related Recommendation
Understanding Mathematical Argument Proof Techniques: Direct Proof and Proof by Contradiction
Detailed Proof and Axiom Verification in Mathematical Logic
Proof Techniques for Odd and Even Properties in Integer Sets
Contradiction in Logic: Resolving Hypotheses in Propositional Logic
Mathematics I Assignment - Tautology, Binomial Coefficients, Series, and Radicals