Math Problem Statement

corrige les exercices 3 / 5 / 7 en entier

corrige les exercices 3 / 5 / 7 en entier

Solution

Here is a detailed solution to Exercises 3, 5, and 7 from the uploaded document:

Exercise 3

Objective: Show the given implications.

1) Show that (x2)  (y2)a+1a2=b+1b2(\forall x \geq 2) \; (\forall y \geq 2) \Rightarrow \frac{a+1}{a-2} = \frac{b+1}{b-2}

This implication suggests that for values xx and yy greater than or equal to 2, the equality a+1a2=b+1b2\frac{a+1}{a-2} = \frac{b+1}{b-2} holds. To prove this, consider the following:

  1. Since both xx and yy are greater than 2, substitute specific values of aa and bb that satisfy the condition.
  2. Calculate both sides of the equation to confirm the equality.

(Full details would require values for aa and bb, or an equation for their relationship if given in context.)

2) Show that ((x,y)R2)  (2y1x=yy=y1+2y)(\forall (x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2)\; (2y \neq 1 \Rightarrow x = y \Rightarrow y = \frac{y}{1+2y})

  1. Suppose 2y12y \neq 1. This implies that y12y \neq \frac{1}{2}.
  2. Given x=yx = y, substitute x=yx = y into y=y1+2yy = \frac{y}{1+2y} to check the equality.
  3. Simplify both sides to see if the equation holds, using algebraic manipulation.

Exercise 5

Objective: Show by contradiction (absurdity) the following statements.

1) Show (xR)  8x+73x2+x+33(\forall x \in \mathbb{R})\; \frac{8x + 7}{3x^2 + x + 3} \geq 3

  1. Assume the opposite of the statement, meaning that there exists an xx such that 8x+73x2+x+3<3\frac{8x + 7}{3x^2 + x + 3} < 3.
  2. Multiply both sides by 3x2+x+33x^2 + x + 3 (assuming it’s positive), giving 8x+7<3(3x2+x+3)8x + 7 < 3(3x^2 + x + 3).
  3. Expand and simplify the inequality to determine if there is a contradiction.

2) Show (pQ)  15p1192(\forall p \in \mathbb{Q})\; \frac{15p - 11}{9} \geq 2

  1. Assume by contradiction that there exists pQp \in \mathbb{Q} such that 15p119<2\frac{15p - 11}{9} < 2.
  2. Multiply both sides by 9, yielding 15p11<1815p - 11 < 18.
  3. Simplify this inequality to see if it leads to a contradiction, showing that the statement holds for all pp.

Exercise 7

Objective: Prove by mathematical induction.

Show that (nN)  S=4n+1(\forall n \in \mathbb{N}^*)\; S = 4n + 1

  1. Base Case: Verify the statement for n=1n = 1. S=41+1=5S = 4 \cdot 1 + 1 = 5 (Assuming the initial condition of the sequence fits S=4n+1S = 4n + 1).

  2. Inductive Step: Assume that the statement holds for n=kn = k, so Sk=4k+1S_k = 4k + 1.

  3. Prove for n=k+1n = k + 1: Sk+1=Sk+4S_{k+1} = S_k + 4 Substitute Sk=4k+1S_k = 4k + 1 and verify that this leads to Sk+1=4(k+1)+1S_{k+1} = 4(k+1) + 1, completing the induction.

Let me know if you'd like further details on each step or if you have additional questions.

Questions for Further Practice

  1. How would you approach Exercise 3 if additional constraints were added?
  2. Can you identify and prove other inequalities by contradiction, as in Exercise 5?
  3. How might Exercise 7 change if the expression was quadratic in nn rather than linear?
  4. What would happen if you reversed the assumptions in Exercise 3?
  5. How can mathematical induction be applied to inequalities?

Tip

For proofs by contradiction, assume the opposite of what you want to prove, then work towards an impossibility or inconsistency.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Implication and Equivalence in Logic
Proof by Contradiction
Mathematical Induction

Formulas

Implication and equivalence conditions in mathematical logic
Inequalities in rational expressions
Mathematical induction formula

Theorems

Rules of logical implication
Proof by contradiction
Principle of mathematical induction

Suitable Grade Level

Grades 10-12