Math Problem Statement

  1. (a) Define the σ-field generated by a class A of subsets of Ω. (b) Prove that if A ⊂ B ⊂ σ(A), then σ(A) = σ(B). (c) Show that the intersection of any number of σ-fields is a σ-field. Redefine σ(A) using this fact

Solution

(a) Definition of the σ-field generated by a class AA of subsets of Ω\Omega:

The σ-field (or σ-algebra) generated by a class AA of subsets of a set Ω\Omega is the smallest σ-field that contains AA. Denoted as σ(A)\sigma(A), it is the intersection of all σ-fields that contain AA. Formally,

σ(A)={FAF and F is a σ-field on Ω}.\sigma(A) = \bigcap \{ \mathcal{F} \mid A \subseteq \mathcal{F} \text{ and } \mathcal{F} \text{ is a σ-field on } \Omega \}.

(b) Proof that if ABσ(A)A \subset B \subset \sigma(A), then σ(A)=σ(B)\sigma(A) = \sigma(B):

Let σ(A)\sigma(A) and σ(B)\sigma(B) denote the σ-fields generated by AA and BB, respectively.

  1. Since ABA \subseteq B:
    By the definition of the generated σ-field, σ(A)σ(B)\sigma(A) \subseteq \sigma(B), because σ(B)\sigma(B) is the smallest σ-field containing BB, and BB contains AA.

  2. Since Bσ(A)B \subseteq \sigma(A):
    Every σ-field containing AA must also contain BB because ABA \subseteq B. Therefore, σ(A)\sigma(A) is also the smallest σ-field containing BB, implying σ(B)σ(A)\sigma(B) \subseteq \sigma(A).

  3. Conclusion:
    From σ(A)σ(B)\sigma(A) \subseteq \sigma(B) and σ(B)σ(A)\sigma(B) \subseteq \sigma(A), it follows that σ(A)=σ(B)\sigma(A) = \sigma(B).


(c) Show that the intersection of any number of σ-fields is a σ-field and redefine σ(A)\sigma(A):

Step 1: Show the intersection of σ-fields is a σ-field

Let {Fα}αI\{ \mathcal{F}_\alpha \}_{\alpha \in I} be a collection of σ-fields on Ω\Omega, where II is an index set. Define

F=αIFα.\mathcal{F} = \bigcap_{\alpha \in I} \mathcal{F}_\alpha.

We show that F\mathcal{F} is a σ-field:

  1. Closure under Ω\Omega:
    Since each Fα\mathcal{F}_\alpha is a σ-field, ΩFα\Omega \in \mathcal{F}_\alpha for all α\alpha. Hence, ΩF\Omega \in \mathcal{F}.

  2. Closure under complementation:
    If AFA \in \mathcal{F}, then AFαA \in \mathcal{F}_\alpha for all α\alpha. Since each Fα\mathcal{F}_\alpha is a σ-field, AcFαA^c \in \mathcal{F}_\alpha for all α\alpha. Therefore, AcFA^c \in \mathcal{F}.

  3. Closure under countable unions:
    If A1,A2,FA_1, A_2, \dots \in \mathcal{F}, then AnFαA_n \in \mathcal{F}_\alpha for all α\alpha and all nn. Since each Fα\mathcal{F}_\alpha is a σ-field, n=1AnFα\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n \in \mathcal{F}_\alpha for all α\alpha. Hence, n=1AnF\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n \in \mathcal{F}.

Thus, F\mathcal{F} is a σ-field.


Step 2: Redefine σ(A)\sigma(A)

Using the above result, the σ-field generated by AA can be redefined as:

σ(A)={FAF and F is a σ-field on Ω}.\sigma(A) = \bigcap \{ \mathcal{F} \mid A \subseteq \mathcal{F} \text{ and } \mathcal{F} \text{ is a σ-field on } \Omega \}.

This emphasizes that σ(A)\sigma(A) is the smallest σ-field containing AA.


Questions to Expand Understanding:

  1. What are some examples of sets AA and their corresponding σ(A)\sigma(A) in probability theory?
  2. Why is the intersection of σ-fields used to define σ(A)\sigma(A)?
  3. Can you prove that σ(A)\sigma(A) is unique for a given AA?
  4. How does the concept of a σ-field apply to measurable functions?
  5. What is the relationship between σ(A)\sigma(A) and the Borel σ-field in R\mathbb{R}?

Tip: When working with σ-fields, always verify the three properties (containment of Ω\Omega, closure under complements, and countable unions) to ensure correctness!

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Measure Theory
Set Theory
σ-fields (sigma-algebras)

Formulas

σ(A) = ⋂ {𝓕 | A ⊆ 𝓕 and 𝓕 is a σ-field on Ω}

Theorems

Smallest σ-field containing a class of subsets
Closure properties of σ-fields
Intersection of σ-fields is a σ-field

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate (Advanced Mathematics or Probability Theory)