Math Problem Statement

Let A be the set of real numbers R. Express the following proposition with a simple sentence. ∀ x ∈ A ∃ y ∈ A [(x < y) ∧ (∀ z ∈ A (x < z) ⇒ (y ≤ z))] Is this proposition TRUE ? If not, is there a set A for which it is TRUE ? Justify your answer.

Solution

Proposition:

The proposition states:
For every real number xx, there exists a real number yy such that x<yx < y and for all real numbers zz, if x<zx < z, then yzy \leq z.

Interpretation:

In simpler terms, this proposition says that for any real number xx, there is a number yy that is greater than xx, and yy is the smallest number greater than xx in the set AA.

Answer:

This proposition is false if A=RA = \mathbb{R} (the set of all real numbers).

Reason:

In the real numbers, there is no smallest number greater than any given real number xx. This is because between any two real numbers, there is always another real number. In other words, the real numbers are dense, and there is no "next" real number after any xx. Therefore, there is no single yy that satisfies the condition of being the smallest number greater than xx.

Is there a set AA for which this proposition is true?

Yes, the proposition would be true if AA is the set of integers Z\mathbb{Z}. In the set of integers, for every integer xx, there is a smallest integer yy such that x<yx < y (which would simply be y=x+1y = x + 1). The integers do not have the same density property as the real numbers, so a smallest integer greater than xx exists.

Conclusion:

  • The proposition is false for A=RA = \mathbb{R}.
  • The proposition is true for A=ZA = \mathbb{Z} (the set of integers).

Would you like any further details or clarifications?

Here are 5 related questions to deepen your understanding:

  1. How does the density property of real numbers affect the existence of a smallest number greater than xx?
  2. How does this proposition relate to concepts like infimum and supremum in set theory?
  3. What are some other sets where the proposition might hold true?
  4. How would the proposition change if we asked for a maximum yy instead of a minimum?
  5. What are other examples of sets where a smallest number greater than xx does exist?

Tip: When working with sets and propositions, always consider the properties of the set, such as density, continuity, or discreteness. These can drastically affect the truth of mathematical statements.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Set Theory
Real Numbers
Integers
Mathematical Logic
Existence Quantifiers
Density Property

Formulas

∀ x ∈ A ∃ y ∈ A [(x < y) ∧ (∀ z ∈ A (x < z) ⇒ (y ≤ z))]

Theorems

Density Property of Real Numbers

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics