Math Problem Statement

1. For each pair of propositions P and Q below, state whether or not P ≡ Q. a) P = p, Q = p ∨ q b) P = p ∧ q, Q = ¬p ∨ ¬q c) P = p → q, Q = ¬p ∨ q d) P = p ∧ (¬q ∨ r), Q = p ∨ (q ∧ ¬r) 2. Determine the truth value of each statement below. The domain of discourse is R. Justify your answers. a) ∀x(x² > x) b) ∃x(x² > x) c) ∀x(x > 1 → x² > x) d) ∃x(x > 1 → x² > x) 3. Determine the truth value of each statement below. The domain of discourse is R × R. Justify your answers. a) ∀x∀y(x² < y + 1) b) ∀x∃y(x² < y + 1) c) ∃x∀y(x² < y + 1) d) ∃x∃y(x² < y + 1)

Solution

Let's go through each of the questions based on the image you've uploaded.

1. For each pair of propositions PP and QQ below, state whether or not PQP \equiv Q.

  • a) P=p,Q=pqP = p, Q = p \lor q

We are asked whether ppqp \equiv p \lor q. This is false in general because pqp \lor q could be true even when pp is false, depending on qq.

  • b) P=pq,Q=¬p¬qP = p \land q, Q = \neg p \lor \neg q

The expression PP is pqp \land q, which is true if both pp and qq are true. The expression QQ is ¬p¬q\neg p \lor \neg q, which is true if at least one of pp or qq is false. These are negations of each other, so P≢QP \not\equiv Q.

  • c) P=pq,Q=¬pqP = p \to q, Q = \neg p \lor q

This is true because pqp \to q is logically equivalent to ¬pq\neg p \lor q by the definition of implication.

  • d) P=p(¬qr),Q=p(q¬r)P = p \land (\neg q \lor r), Q = p \lor (q \land \neg r)

We need to check whether these two compound propositions are logically equivalent. In this case, PP and QQ represent two different logical expressions, so they are generally not equivalent.

2. Determine the truth value of each statement below (domain of discourse is R\mathbb{R}).

  • a) x(x2>x)\forall x (x^2 > x)

This is false, because for x=1x = 1, we have x2=xx^2 = x, and for 0<x<10 < x < 1, x2<xx^2 < x.

  • b) x(x2>x)\exists x (x^2 > x)

This is true because there exist values of xx, such as x=2x = 2, for which x2>xx^2 > x.

  • c) x(x>1x2>x)\forall x (x > 1 \to x^2 > x)

This is true, because for any x>1x > 1, we have x2>xx^2 > x.

  • d) x(x>1x2>x)\exists x (x > 1 \land x^2 > x)

This is true, because there exist values of xx, such as x=2x = 2, for which x>1x > 1 and x2>xx^2 > x.

3. Determine the truth value of each statement below (domain of discourse is R×R\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}).

  • a) xy(x2<y+1)\forall x \forall y (x^2 < y + 1)

This is false. For example, take x=2x = 2 and y=1y = 1. Then x2=4x^2 = 4, which is not less than y+1=2y + 1 = 2.

  • b) xy(x2<y+1)\forall x \exists y (x^2 < y + 1)

This is true, because for any xx, you can always find a yy such that x2<y+1x^2 < y + 1 by choosing a sufficiently large yy.

  • c) xy(x2<y+1)\exists x \forall y (x^2 < y + 1)

This is false because for any fixed xx, you cannot make x2x^2 less than y+1y + 1 for all yy. For large values of yy, x2y+1x^2 \geq y + 1.

  • d) xy(x2<y+1)\exists x \exists y (x^2 < y + 1)

This is true because you can always find xx and yy such that x2<y+1x^2 < y + 1, for example, x=1x = 1 and y=1y = 1.


Do you have any questions or would you like more details on any of these solutions?

5 Related Questions:

  1. What does it mean for two propositions to be logically equivalent?
  2. How can implication (\to) be transformed into disjunction (\lor) in logical statements?
  3. Why does x2>xx^2 > x not hold for all real numbers xx?
  4. How can quantifiers affect the truth value of a logical statement in mathematics?
  5. What strategies can be used to determine whether statements involving multiple quantifiers are true?

Tip:

When working with logical equivalence, remember that transforming the expressions using standard logical identities (e.g., De Morgan's laws, distributive properties) can help clarify their structure.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Propositional Logic
Logical Equivalence
Quantifiers
Real Numbers

Formulas

Logical Equivalence Formulas: P → Q ≡ ¬P ∨ Q
Quantifier Rules: ∀x (P(x)) and ∃x (P(x))

Theorems

De Morgan's Laws
Implication Equivalence in Logic

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics, Logic Courses