Math Problem Statement
Solution
Let's break down and prove the two parts of the problem from the image.
Problem 24: Prove the following
Part (i):
Proof: We will prove this by showing that each side of the equation represents the same set.
-
Left-hand side (LHS):
represents the Cartesian product of set with the union of sets and . So: By definition of union, means that or . Therefore: -
Right-hand side (RHS):
represents the union of two Cartesian products: Therefore, the union is:
Thus, we can see that both sides represent the same set. Hence,
Part (ii):
where denotes the complement of .
Proof: This is De Morgan's Law for set complements. We will prove it as follows:
-
Left-hand side (LHS):
represents the complement of the union of and . In set notation: That means is not in , which implies that is neither in nor in . Therefore: -
Right-hand side (RHS):
represents the intersection of the complements of and : Therefore, the intersection is:
Since both sides represent the same set, we have:
This concludes the proof for both parts.
Would you like further clarification or details on any step?
Here are 5 related questions for further practice:
- Prove the distributive property .
- Can you extend De Morgan's Law to three sets, i.e., prove ?
- Show that .
- Prove the general form of the union of Cartesian products, .
- If , what can you say about ?
Tip: When working with set identities, using Venn diagrams can help visualize and understand relationships more clearly.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Set Theory
Cartesian Products
De Morgan's Laws
Set Complement
Formulas
A x (B ∪ C) = (A x B) ∪ (A x C)
(A ∪ B)^c = A^c ∩ B^c
Theorems
Distributive Property of Cartesian Products
De Morgan's Laws
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 10-12
Related Recommendation
Verify Cartesian Product Identity A × (B ∪ C) = (A × B) ∪ (A × C)
Set Theory: Distributive Properties of Cartesian Products Over Union, Intersection, and Difference
De Morgan's Laws for Sets: Statement and Proof
Proving Set Theory Identities with Predicate Logic
Set Theory Identity Proofs: Complement, Union, and Intersection