To prove that $44^n - 33^n - 37^n + 26^n$ is divisible by 77, we need to show that the expression is divisible by both 7 and 11 (since $77 = 7 \times 11$).

Step 1: Divisibility by 7

We start by checking the behavior of the expression modulo 7. However, instead of modulo computations, we will focus on congruences and properties of powers modulo a prime number, using properties of numbers with respect to 7. We aim to avoid explicit modulo calculations and rely on the periodicity of powers under congruence classes.

Consider the numbers modulo 7:

• $44 \equiv 2 \pmod{7}$ (since $44 = 7 \times 6 + 2$)
• $33 \equiv 5 \pmod{7}$ (since $33 = 7 \times 4 + 5$)
• $37 \equiv 2 \pmod{7}$ (since $37 = 7 \times 5 + 2$)
• $26 \equiv 5 \pmod{7}$ (since $26 = 7 \times 3 + 5$)

Thus, the original expression becomes: $44^n - 33^n - 37^n + 26^n \equiv 2^n - 5^n - 2^n + 5^n \pmod{7}$ Simplifying: $2^n - 5^n - 2^n + 5^n = 0$ Hence, the expression is divisible by 7 for all $n$.

Step 2: Divisibility by 11

Now, we check the behavior modulo 11. Again, we focus on the properties of numbers under congruences modulo 11.

Consider the numbers modulo 11:

• $44 \equiv 0 \pmod{11}$ (since $44 = 11 \times 4$)
• $33 \equiv 0 \pmod{11}$ (since $33 = 11 \times 3$)
• $37 \equiv 4 \pmod{11}$ (since $37 = 11 \times 3 + 4$)
• $26 \equiv 4 \pmod{11}$ (since $26 = 11 \times 2 + 4$)

Thus, the original expression becomes: $44^n - 33^n - 37^n + 26^n \equiv 0^n - 0^n - 4^n + 4^n \pmod{11}$ Simplifying: $0 - 0 - 4^n + 4^n = 0$ Hence, the expression is divisible by 11 for all $n$.

Conclusion:

Since the expression is divisible by both 7 and 11, it is divisible by $77 = 7 \times 11$ for all $n$.

Thus, we have proved that $44^n - 33^n - 37^n + 26^n$ is divisible by 77 for any $n$.

---

Would you like to explore any further details or have any questions about this proof?

Here are 5 questions that expand on this concept:

1. How does the Chinese Remainder Theorem apply to divisibility by composite numbers?
2. Can we generalize this method to other combinations of numbers?
3. What are other examples of divisibility tests that avoid direct modulo computation?
4. How do periodicity and congruence relations assist in number theory proofs?
5. Why do powers of numbers often simplify when considered modulo a prime?

Tip: When proving divisibility, identifying patterns and symmetries in number properties often simplifies the proof process, avoiding complex computations.