Math Problem Statement
A company is producing rectangular boxes with a square base and an open top that can hold a volume of 400 cubic centimeters. The material for the base costs £5 per square centimeter and the material for the sides costs £2 per square centimeter. Determine the dimensions of the box that will minimize the cost of the materials.
Solution
We are tasked with determining the dimensions of a rectangular box with a square base and an open top that minimizes the cost of materials, subject to the constraint that the box must hold a volume of 400 cubic centimeters.
Step 1: Define the variables
Let:
- be the side length of the square base (in cm).
- be the height of the box (in cm).
Step 2: Volume constraint
The volume of the box is given by the formula: Since the volume is constrained to 400 cubic centimeters, we have:
Step 3: Cost of materials
- The cost of the base is pounds per square centimeter. The area of the base is , so the cost for the base is:
- The cost of the sides is pounds per square centimeter. There are four sides, each with an area of , so the total cost of the sides is: Using , we substitute this into the expression for the cost of the sides:
Step 4: Total cost function
The total cost is the sum of the costs of the base and the sides:
Step 5: Minimize the cost
To minimize the cost, we need to find the critical points by taking the derivative of with respect to and setting it equal to zero. First, we compute the derivative: Now set the derivative equal to zero and solve for : Multiply through by to eliminate the denominator: Approximating this value:
Step 6: Find the height
Using cm, we can find the height from the volume equation:
Step 7: Verify the second derivative
To ensure that this critical point is a minimum, we check the second derivative of : Since for all , the function is concave up at , confirming that this critical point is a minimum.
Conclusion
The dimensions that minimize the cost are approximately:
- Side length of the square base: cm
- Height of the box: cm
Would you like further details on any of the steps?
Here are 5 related questions to explore this concept further:
- What would happen to the optimal dimensions if the volume of the box increased to 600 cubic centimeters?
- How would the optimal dimensions change if the cost of the base material doubled?
- What is the impact of having a closed top on the cost and dimensions?
- How can the cost function be minimized using a graphical approach?
- What if the base is not square but rectangular—how would the optimization process differ?
Tip: Always check the second derivative when determining whether a critical point is a minimum or maximum.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Optimization
Calculus
Volume and Surface Area
Cost Analysis
Formulas
Volume of the box: V = x^2 * h
Cost of materials: C(x) = 5x^2 + 1600/x
Derivative of cost: C'(x) = 10x - 1600/x^2
Second derivative: C''(x) = 10 + 3200/x^3
Theorems
Critical Point Analysis
Second Derivative Test
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 11-12 or College Level
Related Recommendation
Optimizing Box Dimensions for Minimal Material Usage
Minimize Cost for an Open-Top Rectangular Box with Volume Constraint
Minimizing Material Cost for an Open-Top Box with Given Volume
Minimizing the Cost of an Open-Top Rectangular Box with Volume Constraint
Find Minimum Cost of Rectangular Box with Volume 180 cm3