https://file.aiquickdraw.com/mathbot/file/17263667092843nlhpixy.jpg

Let's analyze the information provided and the question:

### Rate of Change Intervals:

- For \( 0 < x < 2 \): Rate of change is *positive and decreasing*.
- For \( 2 < x < 3 \): Rate of change is *negative and decreasing*.
- For \( 3 < x < 4 \): Rate of change is *positive and increasing*.
- For \( 4 < x < 5 \): Rate of change is *negative and increasing*.

### The four options to evaluate are:

(A) \( f \) has a global minimum at \( x = 0 \).

(B) \( f \) has a local maximum at \( x = 3 \).

(C) \( f \) has a local maximum at \( x = 4 \).

(D) \( f(x) = 0 \) for some \( x \) with \( 2 < x < 3 \).

---

### Analysis:

- **For \( 0 < x < 2 \)**: The rate of change is *positive and decreasing*. This means the function is increasing overall but at a decreasing rate (slowing down). Therefore, there could be a local or global minimum at \( x = 0 \), but the function is increasing right after \( x = 0 \).

- **For \( 2 < x < 3 \)**: The rate of change is *negative and decreasing*. This implies that the function is decreasing overall but the rate at which it is decreasing is slowing down (becoming less steep). This suggests that there may be a turning point near \( x = 3 \).

- **For \( 3 < x < 4 \)**: The rate of change is *positive and increasing*, so the function is increasing and getting steeper. This suggests \( x = 3 \) could be a local minimum because the function transitions from decreasing to increasing.

- **For \( 4 < x < 5 \)**: The rate of change is *negative and increasing*, so the function is decreasing, but the rate of decrease is slowing down.

---

### Evaluating the Statements:

(A) **Global minimum at \( x = 0 \)**: This is *not necessarily true* since we do not have enough information about the behavior of the function at \( x = 0 \). The function is increasing for \( 0 < x < 2 \), but this does not guarantee that \( x = 0 \) is a minimum, let alone a global minimum.

(B) **Local maximum at \( x = 3 \)**: This is *false*. The function is actually increasing after \( x = 3 \) (for \( 3 < x < 4 \)), which suggests that \( x = 3 \) is likely a local minimum, not a maximum.

(C) **Local maximum at \( x = 4 \)**: This is *false*. The rate of change is still positive for \( 3 < x < 4 \), so \( x = 4 \) is not a local maximum. The function is still increasing at that point.

(D) **\( f(x) = 0 \) for some \( x \) with \( 2 < x < 3 \)**: This is *possible* because the rate of change is negative in this interval, meaning the function is decreasing. If the function is positive before this interval and decreases, it may cross the x-axis and have a root (where \( f(x) = 0 \)) between \( 2 < x < 3 \).

---

### Conclusion:

- The correct answer is **(D)**: \( f(x) = 0 \) for some \( x \) with \( 2 < x < 3 \).

---

Would you like further details or clarifications?

### Related Questions:
1. What is the significance of a positive rate of change?
2. How does a decreasing rate of change affect the function's behavior?
3. Can the function have more than one root in the interval \( 2 < x < 3 \)?
4. What happens to the function as the rate of change increases?
5. How do critical points relate to the given information about the rate of change?

**Tip:** Whenever the rate of change switches signs (from positive to negative or vice versa), check for critical points, as they may indicate local extrema.

The function f is defined for 0 ≤ x ≤ 5. Information about the rate of change of f is given for select intervals of x. Which of the following must be true?

Explore the behavior of a function based on rate of change across intervals and determine critical points, possible local extrema, and zero crossings in this calculus problem.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation