Math Problem Statement
Solution
Let's break down and address the two parts of the question in the image:
(a) Prove or Disprove:
Statement: Every function that is a bijection is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.
Solution:
A bijection means the function is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto). The claim suggests that any bijection from to must be either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. We will consider whether this is necessarily true for all bijections.
- If a function is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing, then it must be injective because two different values in the domain map to different values in the codomain.
- Additionally, if the function is surjective, it must map every value of onto , meaning no value in the codomain is missed.
While it's true that any strictly increasing or strictly decreasing function would satisfy the conditions for a bijection, there exist functions that are bijections but are neither strictly increasing nor strictly decreasing.
Counterexample:
Consider the piecewise function defined as:
\begin{cases} x, & \text{if } x \geq 0 \\ x - 2, & \text{if } x < 0 \end{cases}$$ - This function is **bijective** because every point in $$\mathbb{R}$$ is mapped uniquely, and the function is onto. - However, it is neither strictly increasing nor strictly decreasing because at $$x = 0$$, the function has a discontinuity. Thus, the statement is **false**. Not every bijection is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. ### (b) Prove or Disprove: **Statement:** Every function $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$ that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing is a bijection. #### Solution: Let’s analyze this step by step. - A function that is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing will be injective because, by definition, no two distinct points $$x_1$$ and $$x_2$$ will have the same function value. In other words, $$f(x_1) \neq f(x_2)$$ if $$x_1 \neq x_2$$. - To check surjectivity (onto), note that for a function $$f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$$, since $$f(x)$$ either strictly increases or strictly decreases without any bounds, it must map every real number in the codomain $$\mathbb{R}$$. Thus, it covers the entire real line. Therefore, if a function is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing, it will indeed be a bijection. Hence, the statement is **true**. --- Do you want more details on any part? Feel free to ask! Here are some related questions: 1. What other examples can be used to prove a bijection that isn't strictly monotonic? 2. How can we define bijections for functions that are not continuous? 3. How does the concept of monotonicity relate to differentiability? 4. Can a piecewise function be a bijection without being monotonic? 5. What role do inverses of functions play in the study of bijections? **Tip:** A strictly increasing or decreasing function has a well-defined inverse, which can simplify analyzing bijections.Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Functions
Bijections
Monotonicity
Real Analysis
Formulas
-
Theorems
Definition of a Bijection
Monotonicity Theorem
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate (Math Majors or Real Analysis Course)
Related Recommendation
Constructing and Proving a Bijection from [0,1] to [0,1)
Proof that the Inverse of a One-One, Onto Function is also One-One and Onto
Bijective Functions that are Not Monotonic (Increasing or Decreasing)
Exercises on Monotonicity, Injectivity, and Constant Functions
Constructing and Proving a Bijection from [0,1] to [0,1)