95% sensitivity has been reported in the screening of cancer patients from non-cancer patients.
In the previous study, with a probability of 0.4, people in the community are suffering from this type of cancer.
If the result is positive for a person, the probability that the person will get cancer

To solve this, we can use **Bayes' Theorem** to find the probability that a person has cancer given a positive result. 

Bayes' Theorem formula is:

\[
P(\text{Cancer} | \text{Positive}) = \frac{P(\text{Positive} | \text{Cancer}) \cdot P(\text{Cancer})}{P(\text{Positive})}
\]

Where:
- \( P(\text{Cancer} | \text{Positive}) \) is the probability of having cancer given a positive result (what we need to find).
- \( P(\text{Positive} | \text{Cancer}) = 0.95 \) is the sensitivity, or the probability that a person with cancer gets a positive result.
- \( P(\text{Cancer}) = 0.4 \) is the prior probability of having cancer in the community.
- \( P(\text{Positive}) \) is the total probability of testing positive, regardless of whether or not the person has cancer.

We need to calculate \( P(\text{Positive}) \), which can be found using the law of total probability:

\[
P(\text{Positive}) = P(\text{Positive} | \text{Cancer}) \cdot P(\text{Cancer}) + P(\text{Positive} | \text{No Cancer}) \cdot P(\text{No Cancer})
\]

Where:
- \( P(\text{Positive} | \text{No Cancer}) \) is the false positive rate, which is \( 1 - \text{specificity} \). Since the specificity is not provided, we will assume it is 1 for simplicity (i.e., no false positives, which means \( P(\text{Positive} | \text{No Cancer}) = 0 \)).
- \( P(\text{No Cancer}) = 1 - P(\text{Cancer}) = 0.6 \).

Substituting the given values:

\[
P(\text{Positive}) = 0.95 \times 0.4 + 0 \times 0.6 = 0.38
\]

Now, applying Bayes' Theorem:

\[
P(\text{Cancer} | \text{Positive}) = \frac{0.95 \times 0.4}{0.38} = \frac{0.38}{0.38} = 1
\]

Therefore, the probability that a person has cancer given a positive result is 1 (or 100%).

This result suggests that with the assumptions made (such as the absence of false positives), a positive result guarantees that the person has cancer. In reality, false positives would exist, so the result would be lower.

Would you like me to adjust for false positives or provide additional details?

---

**Related Questions:**
1. What is the importance of sensitivity and specificity in a diagnostic test?
2. How does false positive and false negative rates affect the interpretation of test results?
3. Can we improve the accuracy of cancer screening tests? How?
4. What other factors should be considered when interpreting a cancer screening test result?
5. How do you calculate the probability of a negative result in a test?

**Tip:** Always consider the specificity of a test when evaluating the likelihood of a disease based on a positive result!

95% sensitivity has been reported in the screening of cancer patients from non-cancer patients. In the previous study, with a probability of 0.4, people in the community are suffering from this type of cancer. If the result is positive for a person, the probability that the person will get cancer

Learn how to apply Bayes' Theorem to calculate the probability of having cancer based on a positive screening result. This solution covers concepts like sensitivity, conditional probability, and prior probabilities, with an example using a 95% sensitivity and 40% cancer prevalence. Suitable for advanced high school students (Grades 11-12).

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation