The sequence you've provided is: 20, 29, 36, 22, 11, 22.

Let's examine the sequence to see if there's an identifiable pattern:

1. Differences Between Terms:

   • $29 - 20 = 9$
   • $36 - 29 = 7$
   • $22 - 36 = -14$
   • $11 - 22 = -11$
   • $22 - 11 = 11$

   The differences don't form a simple arithmetic pattern.

2. Possible Patterns:

   • Repetition of Values: The number 22 repeats twice, which might be significant.
   • Randomness: The sequence could be random without a deterministic pattern.
   • Prime Numbers: Checking if the numbers are related to primes:
     • 20 (Not Prime)
     • 29 (Prime)
     • 36 (Not Prime)
     • 22 (Not Prime)
     • 11 (Prime)
     • 22 (Not Prime)

   It doesn't seem to relate to prime numbers either.

3. Other Possible Patterns:

   • The sequence could be derived from a formula or function, but without additional context, it’s difficult to ascertain a definitive rule.
   • It might also be a mix of arithmetic and geometric progressions or other mathematical functions.

At this point, no clear pattern is immediately apparent from these numbers, suggesting they might either follow a more complex or hidden rule, or they might be randomly generated.

Would you like to delve into specific areas such as different possible sequences or any contextual details that might explain these numbers?

---

Relative Questions:

1. Could this sequence be part of a larger set where a pattern might be more visible?
2. Are there any operations you might consider applying to see a pattern?
3. Have you tried organizing the numbers in a different way, such as their digit sum?
4. Could there be a geometric or algebraic pattern hidden in these numbers?
5. Could any external context (e.g., a specific formula or real-world application) relate these numbers?
6. What happens if you check for modulo patterns between these numbers?
7. Is there a possibility of a cyclic pattern within these numbers?
8. Could the sequence be based on non-linear progression?

Tip: When faced with seemingly random sequences, always check if rearranging or applying a simple transformation reveals a hidden pattern.