A task completed in 1.16 hours versus the estimated 6.66 hours

The task that was completed in **1.16 hours** versus the estimated **6.66 hours** can be analyzed as follows:

1. **Difference in Time**: 
   The difference between the actual and estimated time is:
   \[
   6.66 - 1.16 = 5.5 \text{ hours}
   \]
   This means the task was completed **5.5 hours** faster than expected.

2. **Percentage of Actual Time Compared to Estimated Time**:
   To find the percentage of time the task took compared to the estimated time:
   \[
   \frac{1.16}{6.66} \times 100 = 17.42\%
   \]
   So, the task took approximately **17.42%** of the estimated time.

3. **Efficiency**:
   To measure efficiency, you can compare the ratio of the estimated time to the actual time:
   \[
   \frac{6.66}{1.16} \approx 5.74
   \]
   This indicates the task was done about **5.74 times faster** than estimated.

### Would you like more details on any part of this analysis?

### Related Questions:
1. How do you calculate the time savings as a percentage of the original estimate?
2. How would the efficiency change if the task was completed in 2 hours instead of 1.16 hours?
3. What are the factors that might cause a task to be completed much faster than expected?
4. How does reducing time affect the overall cost of a project?
5. Can this method of comparison be applied to other areas, like budgeting or resource estimation?

### Tip:
When estimating time for tasks, consider adding a buffer for unforeseen efficiencies or delays to improve accuracy.

Analyze how a task completed in 1.16 hours compares to the estimated 6.66 hours. Learn about time difference, percentage of actual time taken, and efficiency, using simple formulas. Suitable for high school students (Grades 9-12).

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation