Math Problem Statement

Question 4 (15 points) kstse 14 Consider the following stochastic process: οΏ½ οΏ½ 𝑝𝑑𝑑 = 2+0.2π‘π‘π‘‘π‘‘βˆ’1 +πœ€πœ€π‘‘π‘‘ βˆ’0.2πœ€πœ€π‘‘π‘‘βˆ’1 ; πœ€πœ€π‘‘π‘‘~𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝑁𝑁(0,1) (a) Is the process stationary? Briefly explain. (3 points) The process is just white noise. It’s stationary. (b) Can the process be represented by an AR(∞) process? Briefly explain. (2 points) NOPE. (c) Does the unconditional mean of {𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑} exist? If yes, what is it? (2 points) YES, it’s equal to 2.5. (d) Does the unconditional variance of {𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑} exist? If yes, what is it? (2 points) YES, it’s equal to 1. (e) Can the process be used for forecasting the long-run value for 𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑+∞? (2 points) Yes, it’s just ZERO. (f) Suppose 𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑 = 2,π‘π‘π‘‘π‘‘βˆ’1 = 1,π‘π‘π‘‘π‘‘βˆ’2 = βˆ’1. Determine the forecast for 𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑+2 and the corresponding forecast variance πœŽπœŽπ‘‘π‘‘+2|𝑑𝑑 2 Answers:
οΏ½ οΏ½ 𝑓𝑑𝑑,1 = 2.5; 𝑀𝑀𝑑𝑑,1 = πœ€πœ€π‘‘π‘‘+1, πœŽπœŽπ‘‘π‘‘+1|𝑑𝑑 2 . (4 points) =𝑉𝑉𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝(πœ€πœ€π‘‘π‘‘+1) = 1 οΏ½ οΏ½ 𝑓𝑑𝑑,2 = 2.5; 𝑀𝑀𝑑𝑑,2 = πœ€πœ€π‘‘π‘‘+2, πœŽπœŽπ‘‘π‘‘+2|𝑑𝑑 2 =𝑉𝑉𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝(πœ€πœ€π‘‘π‘‘+2) = 1

Solution

Let's carefully address each part of the stochastic process question:


Given Process:

pt=2+0.2ptβˆ’1+Ξ΅tβˆ’0.2Ξ΅tβˆ’1,Ξ΅t∼i.i.d. N(0,1)p_t = 2 + 0.2p_{t-1} + \varepsilon_t - 0.2\varepsilon_{t-1}, \quad \varepsilon_t \sim i.i.d. \ N(0,1)


(a) Is the process stationary? Explain.

A process is stationary if its mean, variance, and autocovariance do not change over time.

  • Mean and variance: The autoregressive term 0.2ptβˆ’10.2p_{t-1} and the moving average component βˆ’0.2Ξ΅tβˆ’1-0.2\varepsilon_{t-1} have constant coefficients.
  • Autocovariance: The dependence on past Ξ΅\varepsilon terms and the autoregressive coefficient ensure that autocovariances stabilize over time.

Conclusion: The process is stationary because the coefficients are stable, and the white noise Ξ΅t\varepsilon_t has constant properties over time.


(b) Can the process be represented by an AR(∞\infty) process? Explain.

An AR(∞\infty) representation is possible for MA processes or mixed ARMA models.

Here, the process is an ARMA(1,1) (due to 0.2ptβˆ’10.2p_{t-1} and βˆ’0.2Ξ΅tβˆ’1-0.2\varepsilon_{t-1}):

  • AR terms can theoretically extend indefinitely, making it representable as AR(∞\infty).

Conclusion: Yes, the process can be represented by AR(∞\infty).


(c) Does the unconditional mean of {pt}\{p_t\} exist? If yes, what is it?

The unconditional mean of a stationary process is: ΞΌ=Constant term1βˆ’Ο•,Ο•=autoregressive coefficient.\mu = \frac{\text{Constant term}}{1 - \phi}, \quad \phi = \text{autoregressive coefficient}.

Here, the constant term is 22 and Ο•=0.2\phi = 0.2: ΞΌ=21βˆ’0.2=2.5.\mu = \frac{2}{1 - 0.2} = 2.5.

Conclusion: The unconditional mean exists, and it is 2.5.


(d) Does the unconditional variance of {pt}\{p_t\} exist? If yes, what is it?

The unconditional variance for an ARMA process is given by: Var(pt)=Οƒ21βˆ’Ο•2,Οƒ2=variance of Ξ΅t.\text{Var}(p_t) = \frac{\sigma^2}{1 - \phi^2}, \quad \sigma^2 = \text{variance of }\varepsilon_t.

Here, Οƒ2=1\sigma^2 = 1 and Ο•=0.2\phi = 0.2: Var(pt)=11βˆ’0.22=11βˆ’0.04=10.96β‰ˆ1.04.\text{Var}(p_t) = \frac{1}{1 - 0.2^2} = \frac{1}{1 - 0.04} = \frac{1}{0.96} \approx 1.04.

Conclusion: The unconditional variance exists, and it is approximately 1.04.


(e) Can the process be used for forecasting the long-run value of pt+∞p_{t+\infty}?

For a stationary ARMA process, the long-run forecast converges to the unconditional mean: pt+∞=μ=2.5.p_{t+\infty} = \mu = 2.5.

Conclusion: Yes, the process can forecast the long-run value, and it is 2.5.


(f) Forecast for pt+2p_{t+2} and forecast variance Οƒt+2∣t2\sigma^2_{t+2|t}:

Given:

  • pt=2p_t = 2,
  • ptβˆ’1=1p_{t-1} = 1,
  • ptβˆ’2=βˆ’1p_{t-2} = -1.

The forecast equations follow: [ f_{t,1} = E[p_{t+1}|t] = 2 + 0.2p_t + E[\varepsilon_{t+1}] = 2 + 0.2(2) = 2.4, ] with Οƒt+1∣t2=Var(Ξ΅t+1)=1\sigma^2_{t+1|t} = \text{Var}(\varepsilon_{t+1}) = 1.

For t+2t+2: ft,2=E[pt+2∣t]=2+0.2ft,1=2+0.2(2.4)=2.48,f_{t,2} = E[p_{t+2}|t] = 2 + 0.2f_{t,1} = 2 + 0.2(2.4) = 2.48, and Οƒt+2∣t2=Var(Ξ΅t+2)=1\sigma^2_{t+2|t} = \text{Var}(\varepsilon_{t+2}) = 1.

Conclusion:

  • Forecast for pt+2p_{t+2}: 2.48.
  • Forecast variance: 1.

Additional Queries and Tip:

  1. Why does stationarity depend on the stability of the coefficients?
  2. How does an ARMA(1,1) process compare to a pure AR(1) process in terms of variance?
  3. Why does the long-run forecast converge to the mean for stationary processes?
  4. Could this process exhibit non-stationarity under different parameter values?
  5. How do the autoregressive and moving average terms interact in an ARMA process?

Tip: For ARMA processes, ensure the stationarity condition (βˆ£Ο•βˆ£<1|\phi| < 1) is satisfied before computing long-run forecasts.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Stochastic Processes
Stationarity
Autoregressive Models (AR)
Moving Average Models (MA)
ARMA Models

Formulas

Mean of AR(1): ΞΌ = c / (1 - Ο†)
Variance of AR(1): Var(p_t) = σ² / (1 - φ²)
Long-run forecast: p_{t+∞} = μ

Theorems

Stationarity Condition: |Ο†| < 1
ARMA Process Representation Theorem

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Level (Econometrics, Time Series Analysis)