Math Problem Statement

joe writes N distinct positive integers on a board and calculates their pairwise sums. if all the digits from 0 to 9 appear in at least one of the units digits of the sums, find the smallest possible value of N

Solution

We are tasked with finding the smallest possible value of NN such that Joe writes NN distinct positive integers on a board and all digits from 0 to 9 appear as the units digits of the pairwise sums of these integers.

Understanding the problem

Given NN distinct integers x1,x2,,xNx_1, x_2, \dots, x_N, Joe calculates all their pairwise sums, which means he computes xi+xjx_i + x_j for all 1i<jN1 \leq i < j \leq N. The challenge is to ensure that every digit from 0 to 9 appears at least once as the units digit in one of these sums.

Key observations

  • The units digit of a sum xi+xjx_i + x_j depends only on the units digits of xix_i and xjx_j. For example, if xi=7x_i = 7 and xj=8x_j = 8, the sum xi+xj=15x_i + x_j = 15, and its units digit is 55.
  • Therefore, the problem reduces to selecting NN distinct integers such that the set of all possible units digits of their pairwise sums covers all digits from 0 to 9.
  • Since we are interested only in the units digits of the integers, without loss of generality, we can assume x1,x2,,xNx_1, x_2, \dots, x_N have distinct units digits. That is, we can think of x1,x2,,xNx_1, x_2, \dots, x_N as being distinct elements from the set {0,1,2,,9}\{0, 1, 2, \dots, 9\}.

Step-by-step approach

We want to select a set of distinct units digits such that the pairwise sums of these digits cover all digits from 0 to 9. Let’s examine how many distinct integers we need to achieve this.

  1. If N=2N = 2, the pairwise sums consist of only one sum, which gives only one possible units digit, so N=2N = 2 is not enough.

  2. If N=3N = 3, the possible sums are x1+x2x_1 + x_2, x1+x3x_1 + x_3, and x2+x3x_2 + x_3. This gives us at most 3 distinct units digits, so N=3N = 3 is also not enough.

  3. If N=4N = 4, the possible sums are x1+x2x_1 + x_2, x1+x3x_1 + x_3, x1+x4x_1 + x_4, x2+x3x_2 + x_3, x2+x4x_2 + x_4, and x3+x4x_3 + x_4. This gives us 6 distinct sums, which is still insufficient to cover all digits from 0 to 9.

  4. If N=5N = 5, there are (52)=10\binom{5}{2} = 10 possible pairwise sums. This means we can potentially have up to 10 distinct units digits, which could be enough to cover all digits from 0 to 9.

Verifying with N=5N = 5

We now need to check if we can choose 5 distinct integers such that their pairwise sums yield all digits from 0 to 9 as units digits. A possible choice of integers is:

{0,1,2,3,9}\{0, 1, 2, 3, 9\}

Let’s calculate the pairwise sums:

  • 0+1=10 + 1 = 1
  • 0+2=20 + 2 = 2
  • 0+3=30 + 3 = 3
  • 0+9=90 + 9 = 9
  • 1+2=31 + 2 = 3
  • 1+3=41 + 3 = 4
  • 1+9=101 + 9 = 10 (units digit = 0)
  • 2+3=52 + 3 = 5
  • 2+9=112 + 9 = 11 (units digit = 1)
  • 3+9=123 + 9 = 12 (units digit = 2)

The distinct units digits we obtain are:

{0,1,2,3,4,5,9}\{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9\}

This set is still missing the digits 6, 7, and 8, so this choice does not work.

Trying another set of integers

Let’s try the set:

{0,1,2,4,7}\{0, 1, 2, 4, 7\}

The pairwise sums are:

  • 0+1=10 + 1 = 1
  • 0+2=20 + 2 = 2
  • 0+4=40 + 4 = 4
  • 0+7=70 + 7 = 7
  • 1+2=31 + 2 = 3
  • 1+4=51 + 4 = 5
  • 1+7=81 + 7 = 8
  • 2+4=62 + 4 = 6
  • 2+7=92 + 7 = 9
  • 4+7=114 + 7 = 11 (units digit = 1)

The distinct units digits we obtain are:

{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\}

This set still misses only the digit 0. Thus, adding the digit 3 (or changing one of the integers) might be needed. After adjustment, the smallest value comes out

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Number Theory
Combinatorics
Modular Arithmetic

Formulas

Pairwise sum units digit: (x_i + x_j) mod 10
Combination formula for pairwise sums: C(N, 2) = N(N-1)/2

Theorems

Pigeonhole Principle
Properties of Modular Arithmetic

Suitable Grade Level

Grades 9-12