Math Problem Statement
- (a) If If f (x) = −1 for all irrational x, f (x) = 1 for all rational x, prove that f is not Riemann integrable on [a, b] for any a < b. What can you say about f 2 ?
Solution
To prove that the function is not Riemann integrable on , we first recall the Riemann integrability criterion: A function is Riemann integrable on an interval if and only if it is bounded and its set of discontinuities has Lebesgue measure zero (i.e., the set of discontinuities is "small").
Step 1: Understanding the function
We are given that the function is defined as:
- for all irrational
- for all rational
So, takes the value 1 for rational numbers and -1 for irrational numbers. The rationals and irrationals are dense in , meaning that between any two real numbers, there are both rational and irrational numbers.
Step 2: Discontinuities of
To check the continuity of , we need to examine the points where may fail to be continuous. A function is continuous at a point if the following holds: However, in our case, for any point , the function takes different values for rational and irrational numbers arbitrarily close to :
- If is rational, , but there are irrational numbers arbitrarily close to where .
- Similarly, if is irrational, , but there are rational numbers arbitrarily close to where .
Thus, has a discontinuity at every point in , because the limit does not exist due to the jump between 1 (for rationals) and -1 (for irrationals). In fact, the set of discontinuities is the entire interval , which has Lebesgue measure equal to the length of the interval .
Step 3: Applying the Riemann Integrability Criterion
Since the function is discontinuous at every point in , the set of discontinuities has non-zero Lebesgue measure. Therefore, does not satisfy the condition of having discontinuities of measure zero, which is required for Riemann integrability. Hence, is not Riemann integrable on .
Step 4: What about ?
Now, let’s consider . Since for rational and for irrational , we have: Therefore, for every , both rational and irrational. This function is constant, and constant functions are always continuous and Riemann integrable on any interval .
Thus, is Riemann integrable on , and its integral is simply the area under the curve, which is the length of the interval:
Conclusion:
- The function is not Riemann integrable on .
- The function is Riemann integrable, and its integral on is .
Would you like further details on any of these steps, or is there anything else you’d like to explore? Here are some related questions:
- Why are the rationals and irrationals dense in ?
- How does the concept of Lebesgue measure relate to Riemann integrability?
- Can a function with a finite number of discontinuities be Riemann integrable?
- What are other common tests for determining if a function is Riemann integrable?
- Can you prove that any function with a jump discontinuity at every point is not Riemann integrable?
Tip: A useful approach to checking Riemann integrability is to consider the set of discontinuities and apply the criterion that the function is integrable if this set has measure zero.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Riemann Integrability
Discontinuities
Lebesgue Measure
Bounded Functions
Density of Rational and Irrational Numbers
Formulas
f(x) = 1 for rational x
f(x) = -1 for irrational x
f^2(x) = 1 for all x in R
Theorems
Riemann Integrability Criterion
Lebesgue Measure Zero Criterion
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 11-12, College-Level Calculus
Related Recommendation
Integrability of Function Defined by Rational and Irrational Values on [0,1]
Riemann Integrability of f and f^2 on [0, 1]
Investigating the Integrability of a Function Defined by Rational and Irrational Numbers
Riemann Integrability of Discontinuous Functions: Upper and Lower Sums
Riemann Integrability and Continuity of a Piecewise Function Defined on Q ∩ [0,1] and its Complement