Math Problem Statement

Using the formal definition of a limit to show that (a) lim_{x -> 2} (x^2 - 3) = 1 and (b) lim_{x -> 2} (2^x - 3) = 1.

Solution

The problem asks you to use the formal definition of a limit to prove that:

(a) limx2(x23)=1\lim_{x \to 2} (x^2 - 3) = 1

(b) limx2(2x3)=1\lim_{x \to 2} (2^x - 3) = 1

The formal definition of a limit states:

For a function f(x)f(x), limxaf(x)=L\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L means that for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists a δ>0\delta > 0 such that 0<xa<δ0 < |x - a| < \delta implies f(x)L<ϵ|f(x) - L| < \epsilon.

Let's proceed with each part:


(a) Prove limx2(x23)=1\lim_{x \to 2} (x^2 - 3) = 1 using the formal definition.

  1. Given function: f(x)=x23f(x) = x^2 - 3, and we want to show that as x2x \to 2, f(x)1f(x) \to 1.

  2. Formal Definition: We need to find a δ>0\delta > 0 such that if 0<x2<δ0 < |x - 2| < \delta, then (x23)1<ϵ|(x^2 - 3) - 1| < \epsilon.

    Simplify: (x23)1=x24=(x2)(x+2)|(x^2 - 3) - 1| = |x^2 - 4| = |(x - 2)(x + 2)|

  3. We now need (x2)(x+2)<ϵ|(x - 2)(x + 2)| < \epsilon. To control x+2|x + 2|, note that for xx near 2, we can assume x2<1|x - 2| < 1, which implies 1<x<31 < x < 3. Thus, x+2<5|x + 2| < 5.

  4. Now, we have: (x2)(x+2)<5x2|(x - 2)(x + 2)| < 5|x - 2|

    To ensure 5x2<ϵ5|x - 2| < \epsilon, set x2<ϵ5|x - 2| < \frac{\epsilon}{5}.

  5. Therefore, for ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, choose δ=ϵ5\delta = \frac{\epsilon}{5}. This guarantees that (x23)1<ϵ|(x^2 - 3) - 1| < \epsilon, which completes the proof.


(b) Prove limx2(2x3)=1\lim_{x \to 2} (2^x - 3) = 1 using the formal definition.

  1. Given function: f(x)=2x3f(x) = 2^x - 3, and we want to show that as x2x \to 2, f(x)1f(x) \to 1.

  2. Formal Definition: We need to find a δ>0\delta > 0 such that if 0<x2<δ0 < |x - 2| < \delta, then (2x3)1<ϵ|(2^x - 3) - 1| < \epsilon.

    Simplify: (2x3)1=2x4|(2^x - 3) - 1| = |2^x - 4|

  3. We now need 2x4<ϵ|2^x - 4| < \epsilon. To control this, we can use the fact that 2x2^x is continuous and differentiable. The derivative ddx(2x)=2xln(2)\frac{d}{dx}(2^x) = 2^x \ln(2).

  4. Using a linear approximation around x=2x = 2 (since we are close to x=2x = 2, the linear approximation works): 2x4+(x2)4ln22^x \approx 4 + (x - 2) \cdot 4 \ln 2 Thus, we have: 2x44ln2x2|2^x - 4| \approx 4 \ln 2 |x - 2|

  5. To ensure 4ln2x2<ϵ4 \ln 2 |x - 2| < \epsilon, set x2<ϵ4ln2|x - 2| < \frac{\epsilon}{4 \ln 2}.

  6. Therefore, for ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, choose δ=ϵ4ln2\delta = \frac{\epsilon}{4 \ln 2}. This guarantees that (2x3)1<ϵ|(2^x - 3) - 1| < \epsilon, completing the proof.


Do you have any questions or want further clarifications on these steps?

Here are 5 related questions you might want to explore:

  1. How does the epsilon-delta definition of a limit work for discontinuous functions?
  2. How can we generalize the process of finding delta for more complex functions?
  3. What are the implications of the continuity of exponential functions in limit proofs?
  4. Can you explain the difference between one-sided limits and two-sided limits using epsilon-delta?
  5. How can limits help in understanding instantaneous rates of change in calculus?

Tip: When using the epsilon-delta definition, always ensure to control every term in your inequality, especially when dealing with products or compositions of functions.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Calculus
Limits
Epsilon-Delta Definition
Quadratic Functions
Exponential Functions

Formulas

For any function f(x), lim_{x -> a} f(x) = L if for every ε > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that 0 < |x - a| < δ implies |f(x) - L| < ε.

Theorems

Epsilon-Delta Definition of Limit
Continuity of Exponential Functions

Suitable Grade Level

University Calculus