Math Problem Statement

Let S ⊆ R be nonempty. Suppose that u ∈ R satisfies the following properties: (i) for every n∈N, u+1/n is not a lower bound of S, (ii) for every n∈N, u−1/n is a lower bound of S. show that u=inf S.

Solution

To show that u=infSu = \inf S, we need to demonstrate two things:

  1. uu is a lower bound of SS.
  2. uu is the greatest lower bound of SS.

1. uu is a Lower Bound of SS

Given:

  • For every nNn \in \mathbb{N}, u1nu - \frac{1}{n} is a lower bound of SS.

This means for all sSs \in S and for each nNn \in \mathbb{N}, u1ns.u - \frac{1}{n} \leq s.

Since this inequality holds for every nNn \in \mathbb{N}, taking the limit as nn \to \infty: limn(u1n)=u.\lim_{n \to \infty} \left( u - \frac{1}{n} \right) = u. So, usu \leq s for all sSs \in S. Therefore, uu is a lower bound of SS.

2. uu is the Greatest Lower Bound of SS

To show u=infSu = \inf S, we need to prove that uu is the greatest lower bound, i.e., if ll is any lower bound of SS, then lul \leq u.

Given:

  • For every nNn \in \mathbb{N}, u+1nu + \frac{1}{n} is not a lower bound of SS.

This implies that for each nNn \in \mathbb{N}, there exists some snSs_n \in S such that: u+1n>sn.u + \frac{1}{n} > s_n.

Since snSs_n \in S, and uu is a lower bound of SS, we have usnu \leq s_n. Therefore, for each nn: usn<u+1n.u \leq s_n < u + \frac{1}{n}.

Thus, snu<1n.s_n - u < \frac{1}{n}.

Taking the limit as nn \to \infty: limn(snu)=0,\lim_{n \to \infty} (s_n - u) = 0, which means limnsn=u.\lim_{n \to \infty} s_n = u.

Since for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, we can choose nn large enough such that 1n<ϵ\frac{1}{n} < \epsilon and u+1nu + \frac{1}{n} is not a lower bound, we find sns_n that is within ϵ\epsilon of uu. Therefore, uu is the greatest number such that uu is less than or equal to all elements of SS.

Since uu is a lower bound and no number greater than uu can be a lower bound (because there exists snSs_n \in S arbitrarily close to uu from above), uu is the greatest lower bound of SS.

Hence, u=infSu = \inf S.

Would you like to see more details on any specific part of this proof, or do you have any other questions?

Here are some related questions for further exploration:

  1. What are the implications of a set having an infimum in the real numbers?
  2. How would the proof change if we considered the supremum instead of the infimum?
  3. Can uu be an element of SS? If so, under what conditions?
  4. How would this proof differ if SS were a subset of Q\mathbb{Q} (rationals) instead of R\mathbb{R}?
  5. Can we use this method to approximate the infimum of a set SS numerically?

Tip: Remember, the infimum of a set SRS \subseteq \mathbb{R} might not be an element of SS, but it is the greatest lower bound that SS has in the real numbers.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Real Analysis
Infimum
Lower Bound
Limits

Formulas

\lim_{n \to \infty} (u - 1/n) = u

Theorems

Definition of Infimum
Properties of Lower Bounds
Limit Theorem

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics