To address each part of the problem, we’ll go through the three steps in detail.

(i) Fitting the Distance-Altitude Data with a 6th Order Polynomial

1. Fit Command: The Fit command in software like Mathematica is used to perform a least-squares fit of a set of data points to a specified model. Here, we are fitting the distance-altitude data points with a 6th order polynomial $p(x) = a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + a_4 x^4 + a_5 x^5 + a_6 x^6$.

2. Plot: Once the polynomial $p(x)$ is obtained, plot it together with the original distance-altitude data points to visually compare the fit. Plot the function over the interval $0 \leq x \leq 4500$ meters.

   In Mathematica, this might look like:

   mathematicaCopy code
   data = {{x1, y1}, {x2, y2}, ..., {x11, y11}}; (* Replace with actual data points *)
   p = Fit[data, {1, x, x^2, x^3, x^4, x^5, x^6}, x];
   Plot[{p, data}, {x, 0, 4500}, PlotStyle -> {Blue, Red}]

(ii) Interpolating the 11 Data Points

1. InterpolatingPolynomial Command: This command generates an interpolating polynomial that passes exactly through each of the given data points. For 11 data points, the order of the polynomial will be $n-1 = 10$ (a 10th-order polynomial), as the interpolating polynomial must have enough terms to match each point exactly.

2. Plot: Plot the interpolating polynomial on the same interval, $0 \leq x \leq 4500$, along with the original data points to see how well it follows the data.

   In Mathematica:

   mathematicaCopy code
   interpPoly = InterpolatingPolynomial[data, x];
   Plot[{interpPoly, data}, {x, 0, 4500}, PlotStyle -> {Green, Red}]

(iii) Comparison and Analysis of the Fit and Interpolation

1. 6th Order Polynomial Fit: This polynomial provides a smooth approximation that minimizes the squared error across the data points, but it does not necessarily pass through each point. It’s ideal for visualizing the overall trend without overfitting to each specific data point, especially if there’s noise in the data.

2. 10th Order Interpolating Polynomial: The interpolating polynomial exactly matches each data point, making it sensitive to the unique variations in the data. However, higher-order polynomials can exhibit significant oscillations between points (Runge's phenomenon), especially with large intervals. This may lead to overfitting, where the function follows the data points exactly but may not generalize the overall profile as well as the 6th-order fit.

3. Justification: The choice between the two depends on the goal:

   • The 6th-order polynomial provides a smoother representation of the hiking profile without fitting each fluctuation exactly, which is generally more reliable for visualizing trends.
   • The 10th-order interpolating polynomial captures all the details of the data but may exhibit exaggerated oscillations that don’t accurately reflect the hiking profile’s true shape.

In summary, the 6th-order polynomial may offer a better overall view of the hiking profile, as it avoids overfitting while capturing the general shape of the altitude changes.

---

Would you like further details or have any questions?

---

Follow-up Questions

1. How does the polynomial order affect the smoothness of the curve?
2. What is Runge's phenomenon, and why does it occur with higher-order polynomials?
3. Could we use a different type of function for fitting, such as an exponential or logarithmic function? Why or why not?
4. How does noise in the data influence the choice of polynomial order for fitting?
5. What other interpolation methods could we explore, like spline interpolation, and how do they compare?

Tip:

When choosing a fitting model, lower-order polynomials generally provide smoother curves and less overfitting, which is advantageous if the data has noise.