Math Problem Statement
given sin(x^2)dx [0,1] give an upper bound for the absolute error that results from approximations and round to 6 decimal places. also, how large do we need to choose n so that each of the approximations is accurate to within 0.001?
Solution
Step 1: Understanding the Problem
We need to approximate the integral:
We aim to:
- Estimate an upper bound for the absolute error that results from using numerical approximations.
- Determine how large to choose (number of intervals) so that the approximation is accurate to within .
Step 2: Use of Trapezoidal Rule for Error Bound
For a smooth function like , we can use the Trapezoidal Rule to approximate the integral. The error in the Trapezoidal Rule for intervals is given by:
where , and . The second derivative of , , will help in estimating the error bound.
Step 3: Deriving and
-
First derivative :
-
Second derivative :
Step 4: Estimating Maximum of
To estimate the error, we need to determine the maximum value of over the interval . Since and are bounded between -1 and 1, we can calculate:
This is a rough upper estimate, based on the fact that both terms and are bounded in magnitude by 2.
Step 5: Error Bound Formula
The error bound for the Trapezoidal Rule is now approximately:
Step 6: Solving for
We want the error to be less than :
Solving for :
Thus, will ensure that the error is less than 0.001.
Step 7: Conclusion
- Upper bound for absolute error:
- Minimum value of for an error less than :
Final Answer:
- The absolute error can be bounded by , where is the number of intervals.
- To ensure an error of less than , .
Would you like more details on how to refine these bounds, or perhaps a demonstration of this approximation? Here are some related questions:
- How does the Simpson’s rule compare with the Trapezoidal rule for this problem?
- What is the geometric intuition behind why the Trapezoidal Rule error decreases with increasing ?
- How does the behavior of affect the error in different numerical methods?
- Can we use adaptive quadrature methods for better accuracy without increasing ?
- What are some common pitfalls in estimating error bounds for oscillating functions like ?
Tip: When approximating integrals, increasing the number of intervals or switching to a more accurate rule (e.g., Simpson’s Rule) can drastically reduce error.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Numerical Integration
Error Estimation
Trapezoidal Rule
Calculus
Formulas
Integral: I = ∫_0^1 sin(x^2) dx
Error Bound (Trapezoidal Rule): E_T = -((b - a)^3 / (12n^2)) ⋅ f''(ξ)
Second Derivative: f''(x) = 2cos(x^2) - 4x^2sin(x^2)
Theorems
Error Bound Theorem for Trapezoidal Rule
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate Level
Related Recommendation
Error Estimation Using Trapezoidal Rule for sin(x^2) from 0 to 1
Error Bound for Trapezoidal Rule with f(x) = 39cos(x^2)
Numerical Integration: Trapezoidal Rule for ∫ sin(x²) dx with 6 Intervals
Estimate Integral of cos(x)/x from 1 to 6 using Trapezoidal Rule with Error Bound
Numerical Integration: Trapezoidal, Midpoint, and Simpson's Rule for sin(t)/t from 5 to 7, n=4