Math Problem Statement

Negate the given logical statements with quantifiers: a) ∀x∀y : Z(x,y), b) ∀x∃y : Z(x,y), c) ∃x∀y : Z(x,y), d) ∃x∃y : Z(x,y).

Solution

To solve this task, we need to find the negation of each statement. I'll work through each one using logical negation rules.

Problem

Given a predicate Z(x,y)Z(x, y), find the negation of each statement.

Solution

a) xy:Z(x,y)\forall x \forall y : Z(x, y)

The negation of this is: ¬(xy:Z(x,y))xy:¬Z(x,y)\neg (\forall x \forall y : Z(x, y)) \equiv \exists x \exists y : \neg Z(x, y) This means that there exists an xx and a yy such that Z(x,y)Z(x, y) is not true.

b) xy:Z(x,y)\forall x \exists y : Z(x, y)

The negation of this is: ¬(xy:Z(x,y))xy:¬Z(x,y)\neg (\forall x \exists y : Z(x, y)) \equiv \exists x \forall y : \neg Z(x, y) This means that there exists an xx such that for all yy, Z(x,y)Z(x, y) is not true.

c) xy:Z(x,y)\exists x \forall y : Z(x, y)

The negation of this is: ¬(xy:Z(x,y))xy:¬Z(x,y)\neg (\exists x \forall y : Z(x, y)) \equiv \forall x \exists y : \neg Z(x, y) This means that for every xx, there exists a yy such that Z(x,y)Z(x, y) is not true.

d) xy:Z(x,y)\exists x \exists y : Z(x, y)

The negation of this is: ¬(xy:Z(x,y))xy:¬Z(x,y)\neg (\exists x \exists y : Z(x, y)) \equiv \forall x \forall y : \neg Z(x, y) This means that for all xx and yy, Z(x,y)Z(x, y) is not true.

Summary of Negations

  1. a) xy:¬Z(x,y)\exists x \exists y : \neg Z(x, y)
  2. b) xy:¬Z(x,y)\exists x \forall y : \neg Z(x, y)
  3. c) xy:¬Z(x,y)\forall x \exists y : \neg Z(x, y)
  4. d) xy:¬Z(x,y)\forall x \forall y : \neg Z(x, y)

Would you like further explanation on any of these steps?


Here are some related questions:

  1. How do we determine the negation of a statement with nested quantifiers?
  2. What is the difference between universal and existential quantifiers?
  3. How do logical negations apply to combinations of quantifiers and predicates?
  4. What are some practical applications of negating quantified statements?
  5. How do these rules apply in programming languages with formal logic?

Tip: When negating statements with quantifiers, remember to switch \forall to \exists and vice versa, and apply negation to the predicate itself.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Mathematical Logic
Quantifiers
Predicate Logic

Formulas

Negation of ∀x : P(x) is ∃x : ¬P(x)
Negation of ∃x : P(x) is ∀x : ¬P(x)

Theorems

De Morgan's Laws for Quantifiers

Suitable Grade Level

University level (Discrete Mathematics)