Math Problem Statement

Let S be a non-empty subset of R . Consider the following statement:

P: There is a rational number x ∈ S such that x

0 .

Which of the following statements is the negation of statement P?

Solution

To find the negation of the statement PP, we first need to restate it clearly:

Statement PP: There is a rational number xx in the set SS such that x>0x > 0.

This can be formally written as: P:xS such that x is rational and x>0.P: \exists x \in S \text{ such that } x \text{ is rational and } x > 0.

Now, to negate this statement, we'll apply the negation to the entire statement.

The negation of "there exists" (\exists) is "for all" (\forall). Therefore, the negation of PP is:

Negation of PP: For all rational numbers xx in SS, x0x \leq 0.

This can be formally written as: ¬P:xS, if x is rational, then x0.\neg P: \forall x \in S, \text{ if } x \text{ is rational, then } x \leq 0.

So, the correct negation of statement PP is:

For every rational number xx in SS, x0x \leq 0.

Would you like to go over the reasoning again or explore related concepts? Here are some related questions:

  1. How do you negate a statement involving "for all" (\forall)?
  2. What are some examples of rational numbers?
  3. How does the negation of an "if-then" statement work?
  4. What is the difference between rational and irrational numbers?
  5. How do you express a logical statement in symbolic form?

Tip: When negating a statement, it's helpful to break it down into its basic logical components.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Logic
Set Theory
Rational Numbers

Formulas

Negation of existential quantifier: ¬(∃x ∈ S, P(x)) ≡ ∀x ∈ S, ¬P(x)

Theorems

Logical Negation
Quantifier Negation Laws

Suitable Grade Level

Grades 9-12