Math Problem Statement

Determine the truth value of each of the following propositions, given the propositional function P(x, y) = x → y, where → denotes logical implication.

Solution

The image shows a mathematical problem involving logical propositions with quantifiers, where you are asked to determine the truth values of several propositions based on the given predicate function P(x,y):xyP(x, y) : x \to y, where xyx \to y stands for the logical implication "x    y""x \implies y".

The propositions are:

  1. P1:xR(yR P(x,y))P_1: \forall x \in \mathbb{R} (\forall y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))
  2. P2:xR(yR P(x,y))P_2: \forall x \in \mathbb{R} (\exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))
  3. P3:xR(yR P(x,y))P_3: \exists x \in \mathbb{R} (\forall y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))
  4. P4:xR(yR P(x,y))P_4: \exists x \in \mathbb{R} (\exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))

Let’s analyze these one by one:

1. P1:xR(yR P(x,y))P_1: \forall x \in \mathbb{R} (\forall y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))

This proposition states that for all real numbers xx, for all real numbers yy, xyx \to y is true. The logical implication xyx \to y is false only when xx is true and yy is false (i.e., x=1x = 1 and y=0y = 0). Since yy can take any real value, including 0, this proposition is false because there exists at least one pair (x,y)=(1,0)(x, y) = (1, 0) for which P(x,y)P(x, y) is false.

2. P2:xR(yR P(x,y))P_2: \forall x \in \mathbb{R} (\exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))

This proposition states that for every real number xx, there exists a yy such that xyx \to y is true. The implication xyx \to y is always true when x=0x = 0 (because 0    y0 \implies y is true for any yy) or when y=1y = 1 (since any true yy makes the implication true). So, for every xx, we can find a suitable yy to make the implication true. Thus, this proposition is true.

3. P3:xR(yR P(x,y))P_3: \exists x \in \mathbb{R} (\forall y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))

This proposition says that there exists some xx such that for all yy, xyx \to y is true. When x=0x = 0, the implication xyx \to y is always true regardless of yy, because 0    y0 \implies y is true for any real yy. Therefore, the proposition is true (since x=0x = 0 satisfies the condition).

4. P4:xR(yR P(x,y))P_4: \exists x \in \mathbb{R} (\exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ P(x, y))

This proposition asserts that there exists some xx and some yy such that xyx \to y is true. Since we only need one pair xx and yy, and the implication is always true when x=0x = 0 or y=1y = 1, this proposition is true.

Conclusion of Truth Values:

  • P1P_1: False
  • P2P_2: True
  • P3P_3: True
  • P4P_4: True

Would you like more details on any of the steps or the concepts used here?

Related questions:

  1. What is the formal definition of logical implication?
  2. How do we determine the truth table of xyx \to y?
  3. How does the presence of quantifiers (like \forall and \exists) affect the truth value of logical statements?
  4. What are the main differences between universal and existential quantifiers?
  5. How do we interpret implications in real-number logic?

Tip:

In logic, implications xyx \to y can often be tricky because they are false only when the first statement is true and the second is false. Always carefully evaluate the conditions that make an implication true or false!

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Propositional Logic
Logical Quantifiers
Implication

Formulas

Implication: x → y
Truth values of quantifiers: ∀ (for all), ∃ (there exists)

Theorems

Truth table of logical implication
Logical quantifiers in propositional logic

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate (Logic/Mathematics)