Math Problem Statement

QUESTION 3 – LINEAR PROGRAMMING (30 marks) The Attaran Corporation manufactures two electrical products: portable air conditioners and portable heaters. The assembly process for each is similar in that both require a certain amount of wiring and drilling. Each air conditioner takes 3 hours of wiring and 2 hours of drilling. Each heater must go through 2 hours of wiring and 1 hour of drilling. During the next production period, 240 hours of wiring time are available and up to 140 hours of drilling time may be used. Each air conditioner sold yields a profit of $ 25. Each heater assembled may be sold for a $ 15 profit. Formulate and solve this LP production- mix situation, and find the best combination of air conditioners and heaters that yields the highest profit.

a) Use X1 and X2 to define the variables indicating which variable is X1 and X2 2 Marks b) Derive the Objective Function in terms of X1 and X2 3 Marks c) Formulate the Constraints under which the company must operate 7 Marks d) Graphically illustrate the Feasible Region 4 Marks e) State the coordinates of the corner points e.g A (2,7), B (12,5) 8 Marks f) Determine the optimal solution 4 Marks g) Determine the profit at the optimal solution 2 Marks

Solution

Let’s systematically break down and solve this Linear Programming (LP) problem:


a) Define Variables (2 Marks)

  • X1X_1: The number of air conditioners produced.
  • X2X_2: The number of heaters produced.

b) Derive the Objective Function (3 Marks)

The objective is to maximize profit.
Each air conditioner yields $25, and each heater yields $15.

The objective function is:
Maximize Z=25X1+15X2\text{Maximize } Z = 25X_1 + 15X_2


c) Formulate Constraints (7 Marks)

  1. Wiring Time Constraint:
    Each air conditioner takes 3 hours, and each heater takes 2 hours. The total available wiring time is 240 hours.
    3X1+2X22403X_1 + 2X_2 \leq 240

  2. Drilling Time Constraint:
    Each air conditioner takes 2 hours, and each heater takes 1 hour. The total available drilling time is 140 hours.
    2X1+X21402X_1 + X_2 \leq 140

  3. Non-Negativity Constraints:
    X10,X20X_1 \geq 0, \, X_2 \geq 0


d) Graphically Illustrate the Feasible Region (4 Marks)

Let’s solve for the boundary lines of each constraint.

  1. From 3X1+2X22403X_1 + 2X_2 \leq 240:

    • If X1=0X_1 = 0: X2=120X_2 = 120 (point: (0,120)(0, 120)).
    • If X2=0X_2 = 0: X1=80X_1 = 80 (point: (80,0)(80, 0)).
  2. From 2X1+X21402X_1 + X_2 \leq 140:

    • If X1=0X_1 = 0: X2=140X_2 = 140 (point: (0,140)(0, 140)).
    • If X2=0X_2 = 0: X1=70X_1 = 70 (point: (70,0)(70, 0)).

Feasible Region

The feasible region is the intersection of the constraints, bounded by these lines and the non-negativity constraints. I will create a graph to show this region.


e) Corner Points (8 Marks)

Using the intersection points of the lines:

  1. (0,0)(0, 0) – Origin.

  2. Intersection of 3X1+2X2=2403X_1 + 2X_2 = 240 and 2X1+X2=1402X_1 + X_2 = 140. Solve simultaneously:

    • From 2X1+X2=1402X_1 + X_2 = 140: X2=1402X1X_2 = 140 - 2X_1.
    • Substitute into 3X1+2(1402X1)=2403X_1 + 2(140 - 2X_1) = 240: 3X1+2804X1=240    X1=40    X1=40.3X_1 + 280 - 4X_1 = 240 \implies -X_1 = -40 \implies X_1 = 40. X2=1402(40)=60X_2 = 140 - 2(40) = 60. Point: (40,60)(40, 60).
  3. (80,0)(80, 0) – From 3X1+2X2=2403X_1 + 2X_2 = 240.

  4. (0,120)(0, 120) – From 3X1+2X2=2403X_1 + 2X_2 = 240.

Corner points: (0,0),(0,120),(40,60),(80,0)(0, 0), (0, 120), (40, 60), (80, 0).


f) Determine the Optimal Solution (4 Marks)

Evaluate the objective function Z=25X1+15X2Z = 25X_1 + 15X_2 at each corner point:

  1. At (0,0)(0, 0): Z=25(0)+15(0)=0Z = 25(0) + 15(0) = 0.
  2. At (0,120)(0, 120): Z=25(0)+15(120)=1800Z = 25(0) + 15(120) = 1800.
  3. At (40,60)(40, 60): Z=25(40)+15(60)=1000+900=1900Z = 25(40) + 15(60) = 1000 + 900 = 1900.
  4. At (80,0)(80, 0): Z=25(80)+15(0)=2000Z = 25(80) + 15(0) = 2000.

Optimal solution: X1=80,X2=0X_1 = 80, X_2 = 0.


g) Determine the Profit at the Optimal Solution (2 Marks)

The maximum profit is: Z=25(80)+15(0)=2000Z = 25(80) + 15(0) = 2000


Would you like me to graph the feasible region or clarify any part?

5 Questions to Expand Knowledge

  1. How does the graphical method help in visualizing LP problems?
  2. Can the simplex method handle more than two variables?
  3. What if there were additional constraints—how would that change the solution?
  4. How can sensitivity analysis be applied to this LP problem?
  5. What real-world factors could affect the accuracy of the LP model?

Tip

When solving LP problems, always check if the constraints form a bounded feasible region to ensure the existence of an optimal solution.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Linear Programming
Optimization
Systems of Inequalities
Graphical Solution Method

Formulas

Objective Function: Maximize Z = 25X1 + 15X2
Constraints: 3X1 + 2X2 ≤ 240, 2X1 + X2 ≤ 140, X1 ≥ 0, X2 ≥ 0

Theorems

Fundamental Theorem of Linear Programming
Corner Point Theorem

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate or Advanced High School (Grades 11-12)