Math Problem Statement

If f(x) = [[x]] + [[−x]], show that lim x→2 f(x) exists but is not equal to f(2). The graph of f(x) = [[x]] + [[−x]] is the same as the graph of g(x) = −1 with holes at each integer, since f(a) =

for any integer a. Also, lim x→2− f(x) =

and
lim x→2+ f(x) = , so
lim x→2 f(x) = . However, f(2) = [[2]] + [[−2]] = 2 +

, so lim x→2 f(x) ≠ f(2).

Solution

Let's work through this step by step to show the required properties about the function f(x)=x+xf(x) = \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor -x \rfloor, where \lfloor \cdot \rfloor represents the greatest integer function or the floor function.

Step 1: Analyze the behavior of f(x)f(x)

We know that: f(x)=x+xf(x) = \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor -x \rfloor The function x\lfloor x \rfloor returns the greatest integer less than or equal to xx, and similarly, x\lfloor -x \rfloor returns the greatest integer less than or equal to x-x.

For non-integer values of xx, this function exhibits a predictable pattern because:

  • x\lfloor x \rfloor jumps to the next integer as xx crosses an integer,
  • x\lfloor -x \rfloor jumps similarly, but the pattern is inverted.

Step 2: Behavior around x=2x = 2

To evaluate the limit, we first check the left-hand and right-hand limits at x=2x = 2.

Left-hand limit (x2x \to 2^-):

Consider values of xx slightly less than 2, e.g., x=1.9x = 1.9: f(1.9)=1.9+1.9=1.9+1.9=1+(2)=1f(1.9) = \lfloor 1.9 \rfloor + \lfloor -1.9 \rfloor = \lfloor 1.9 \rfloor + \lfloor -1.9 \rfloor = 1 + (-2) = -1 This will hold for any x(1,2)x \in (1, 2). Hence: limx2f(x)=1\lim_{x \to 2^-} f(x) = -1

Right-hand limit (x2+x \to 2^+):

Consider values of xx slightly greater than 2, e.g., x=2.1x = 2.1: f(2.1)=2.1+2.1=2.1+2.1=2+(3)=1f(2.1) = \lfloor 2.1 \rfloor + \lfloor -2.1 \rfloor = \lfloor 2.1 \rfloor + \lfloor -2.1 \rfloor = 2 + (-3) = -1 This will hold for any x(2,3)x \in (2, 3). Hence: limx2+f(x)=1\lim_{x \to 2^+} f(x) = -1

Step 3: Conclude the limit exists

Since: limx2f(x)=limx2+f(x)=1\lim_{x \to 2^-} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 2^+} f(x) = -1 we conclude: limx2f(x)=1\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) = -1

Step 4: Check the value at x=2x = 2

At x=2x = 2, we directly compute f(2)f(2): f(2)=2+2=2+(2)=0f(2) = \lfloor 2 \rfloor + \lfloor -2 \rfloor = 2 + (-2) = 0

Step 5: Compare the limit with the value of f(2)f(2)

We found that: limx2f(x)=1andf(2)=0\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) = -1 \quad \text{and} \quad f(2) = 0 Thus: limx2f(x)f(2)\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) \neq f(2)

Conclusion

The limit limx2f(x)\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) exists, but it is not equal to f(2)f(2), confirming that the limit exists but does not match the function's value at x=2x = 2.


Would you like further details or have any questions?

Here are 5 related questions:

  1. What are the properties of the floor function x\lfloor x \rfloor?
  2. Can you generalize this result for other integers aa where xax \to a?
  3. How does the behavior of f(x)f(x) change as xx approaches non-integer values?
  4. What is the significance of a function having a limit that differs from its value at a point?
  5. What other types of discontinuities exist besides jump discontinuities?

Tip: The floor function creates discontinuities at integer points, leading to potential mismatches between limits and function values at those points.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Floor Function
Limits
Discontinuities

Formulas

f(x) = ⌊x⌋ + ⌊-x⌋
lim x→2 f(x) = -1
f(2) = ⌊2⌋ + ⌊-2⌋ = 0

Theorems

Limits and Continuity
Jump Discontinuity

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics