Math Problem Statement

Consider the double-slit pattern shown below. Suppose that a third slit of the same width were added halfway between the original two slits as shown in the figure below the pattern. (Note that this results in the distance between adjacent slits becoming half of the original value.) Would each labeled point (Z, Y, and X) be a point of maximum constructive interference, complete destructive interference, or neither? Explain your reasoning.

Solution

To analyze the given scenario of adding a third slit and determining the interference patterns at points ZZ, YY, and XX, let's proceed step by step:

  1. Basic Setup:

    • Initially, with two slits, the interference pattern is determined by constructive and destructive interference between light waves originating from the two slits.
    • When a third slit is added, positioned equidistantly between the original two, the distances between slits become halved.
  2. Interference Condition:

    • Constructive interference occurs when the path difference between light waves from the slits equals mλm\lambda (where mm is an integer).
    • Destructive interference occurs when the path difference equals (m+12)λ(m + \frac{1}{2})\lambda.
  3. Impact of Adding a Third Slit:

    • With three slits, the contributions from all three need to be summed. The new spacing (half of the original distance) alters the relative phase differences.
    • At points previously associated with constructive interference for two slits, additional interference from the third slit can cause either reinforcement (stronger maxima) or suppression (partial or complete cancellation).
  4. Evaluating Points ZZ, YY, and XX:

    • Point ZZ: With three equidistant slits, all contributions can interfere constructively here if the path differences align as multiples of λ\lambda. Thus, ZZ is likely a point of maximum constructive interference.
    • Point YY: At this location, the phases might cancel out (due to the new phase relationships with the third slit). This could result in complete destructive interference if the amplitudes cancel exactly.
    • Point XX: Similar to YY, depending on the phase relationship, interference could lead to a weaker maximum or a point of neither constructive nor destructive interference.
  5. Conclusion:

    • The addition of a third slit redistributes the intensity of the interference pattern, with potential new maxima and minima. The final classification depends on detailed calculations of path differences.

If you'd like, I can calculate the exact phase differences and intensities for each point. Let me know!

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Wave Interference
Constructive and Destructive Interference
Optical Path Difference

Formulas

Condition for constructive interference: path difference = mλ
Condition for destructive interference: path difference = (m + 1/2)λ

Theorems

Principle of Superposition
Interference in Multi-Slit Diffraction Patterns

Suitable Grade Level

Grades 11-12