The given problem involves conducting a hypothesis test regarding the mean wait time at a gas station. Here is the conclusion based on the context provided:

Conclusion: With 95% confidence, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the mean wait time at the gas station is less than 2 minutes. In other words, it is plausible that the mean wait time is 2 minutes or more.

Do you want further clarification or details about this hypothesis test? Let me know!

Related Questions:

1. What are the possible reasons for failing to reject a null hypothesis in a hypothesis test?
2. How can the sample size influence the outcome of this test?
3. What does a confidence level of 95% imply in terms of hypothesis testing?
4. How might the gas station owner reduce the mean wait time statistically or operationally?
5. What are the consequences of a Type II error in this scenario?

Tip:

When failing to reject a null hypothesis, it does not mean the null hypothesis is true; it simply means there isn't enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. Always frame your conclusions carefully.