Math Problem Statement
Solution
The problem provided involves analyzing Denise's demand functions and the effects of changes in the price of good on her consumption choices. Let's break down each part of the problem as seen in the images.
Part (a)
Problem: Determine Denise's demand functions for and .
The demand functions are derived from Denise's utility function, , and given budget constraint with prices for and as and respectively, and income .
The demand functions are given by:
Part (b)
Problem: Calculate Denise's optimal consumption bundle and total utility given the prices and income.
-
Calculate and :
- For :
- For :
-
Calculate Total Utility:
- Substitute and into the utility function :
Thus, Denise's optimal consumption bundle is with a total utility of 1944.
Part (c)
Problem: Suppose the price of decreases from $6 to $4. Calculate Denise's new consumption bundle and total utility.
-
New Optimal Quantities and :
- For :
- For (unchanged as the price of remains the same):
-
New Total Utility:
- Substitute and into the utility function:
Denise’s new consumption bundle is with a total utility of 6561.
Part (d)
Problem: Solve for the income and substitution effects on due to the price decrease using the Hicksian approach.
To solve for income and substitution effects:
-
Calculate the Hicksian Demand for at the new price while keeping utility constant at 1944 (from the original bundle).
-
Substitution Effect:
- Find the consumption of that maintains utility at 1944 with the new price, holding purchasing power constant (this requires further calculations).
-
Income Effect:
- Calculate the difference between the total effect (from to ) and the substitution effect.
Part (e)
Problem: Solve for the income and substitution effects on due to the price decrease using the Hicksian approach.
Since the price of hasn't changed, the substitution effect for should be zero. However, there may be an income effect on because the decrease in changes real income, potentially leading to an increased quantity demanded of due to increased purchasing power.
Would you like a detailed breakdown of each effect calculation for parts (d) and (e)?
Related Questions to Explore Further:
- How would the solution change if Denise's income were doubled?
- What would be the effects on and if both prices increased by 50%?
- How would Denise’s consumption choices change if her utility function had different exponents?
- Can we generalize the Hicksian approach to non-linear demand functions?
- How would a Cobb-Douglas utility function alter the substitution and income effects?
Tip:
When calculating the Hicksian demand, use the compensated budget approach to isolate substitution effects accurately.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Consumer Theory
Income Effect
Substitution Effect
Hicksian Demand
Formulas
Demand functions: x* = (3M) / (5p_x) and y* = (2M) / (5p_y)
Utility function: U = x^3 y^2
Income and substitution effect calculations
Theorems
Hicksian Demand Theory
Utility Maximization
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate Economics
Related Recommendation
Utility Maximization with Demand Functions and Price Changes
Optimal Consumption and Utility with Price Change: Income and Substitution Effects Example
Income and Substitution Effects Practice Problem: Utility Maximization with Changing Prices
Demand Function Derivation for Utility U(x,y) = xy^5 with Budget Constraint
Effect of Price Change on Cobb-Douglas Utility Function U(x, y) = x^{2/5} y^{3/5}