Math Problem Statement

Let P be a partition of the set X. Define the relation ∼ on the set X by setting x ∼ y if x, y ∈ A for some A ∈ P. Show that ∼ is an equivalence relation

Solution

To show that the relation \sim defined on the set XX is an equivalence relation, we must demonstrate that it satisfies the three properties of an equivalence relation: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.


1. Reflexivity

To show reflexivity, we need to prove that for any xXx \in X, xxx \sim x.

  • By definition of the partition PP, every element xXx \in X belongs to exactly one subset APA \in P.
  • Since xAx \in A, it is trivially true that xxx \sim x because xx and xx belong to the same subset APA \in P.
    Thus, reflexivity holds.

2. Symmetry

To show symmetry, we need to prove that if xyx \sim y, then yxy \sim x.

  • Suppose xyx \sim y. By definition of \sim, this means x,yAx, y \in A for some APA \in P.
  • The relation \sim is defined based on the subsets of PP, so if x,yAx, y \in A, then y,xAy, x \in A as well (set membership is symmetric).
    Thus, symmetry holds.

3. Transitivity

To show transitivity, we need to prove that if xyx \sim y and yzy \sim z, then xzx \sim z.

  • Suppose xyx \sim y and yzy \sim z. By definition of \sim, x,yA1x, y \in A_1 for some A1PA_1 \in P, and y,zA2y, z \in A_2 for some A2PA_2 \in P.
  • Since PP is a partition, every element of XX belongs to exactly one subset of PP. Thus, A1=A2A_1 = A_2, meaning x,y,zA1x, y, z \in A_1.
    Thus, transitivity holds.

Conclusion

Since \sim satisfies reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, it is an equivalence relation on XX.


Would you like further clarification or additional examples?
Here are five related questions to deepen your understanding:

  1. How does the definition of a partition ensure that \sim is well-defined?
  2. Can you provide examples of partitions of a set XX and the corresponding equivalence relations?
  3. Why is set membership inherently symmetric, and how does this relate to symmetry of \sim?
  4. How does the uniqueness of subsets in a partition guarantee transitivity of \sim?
  5. What is the difference between an equivalence class and a subset in the context of partitions?

Tip: When verifying equivalence relations, focus on the definitions of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity individually to ensure clarity and correctness.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Set Theory
Relations
Equivalence Relations
Partitions of Sets

Formulas

-

Theorems

Equivalence Relation Definition
Partition Properties

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics