Math Problem Statement
Question stem: A conical capacitor is formed by having electrodes on conical surfaces. The positive electrode is at θ=θ_+, r_a≤r≤r_b, and 0≤ϕ≤ϕ_0. The negative electrode is at θ=θ_-, r_a≤r≤r_b, and 0≤ϕ≤ϕ_0.
so far I have only computed the electric field (see below). please check all of my working for mistakes/errors. An electric field is established when a voltage is applied across the electrodes, with the field lines pointing from the positive electrode to the negative electrode (i.e. ‘outwards’). The strength of the electric field is inversely proportional to the distance between the electrode, and therefore, the geometry of the capacitor. In this example, with a conical capacitor, there is azimuthal symmetry (ϕ), but not radial symmetry (r) nor angular symmetry (θ) (image link). Therefore, the strength of the electric field varies with the angle, θ, specifically, the difference in the angle size, θ_d, between the two electrodes, and consequently, also the radial distance, r. The electric field will be stronger at the apex of the cone (where the electrodes are closer together) compared to the base of the cone (where the electrodes are further apart). Imagine a conical Gaussian surface located between the two electrodes (i.e. within the dielectric material). As seen in Lecture 2, Slide 4, the electric flux density, D ⃗, and the electric field, Ε ⃗, are related by the equation below. D ⃗=ϵ_0 Ε ⃗ The total electric flux exiting a closed surface is related to that of the charge enclosed within the surface by Gauss’ Law (also defined in Lecture 2, Slide 4). ∯▒〖D ⃗∙ds ⃗ 〗=∯▒〖ϵ_0 Ε ⃗∙ds ⃗ 〗=ϵ_0 ∯▒〖Ε ⃗∙ds ⃗ 〗=Q_enclosed ⇒∯▒〖ℇ ̅∙ds ⃗ 〗=Q_enclosed/ϵ_0 Given the aspects of symmetry discussed above, we infer that the electric field will be in the form Ε ⃗=E(r,θ) a ̂_r In other words, the electric field is radial, but can vary with both r and θ. As seen in this online source, ds ⃗ can be expressed as ds ⃗=r^2 sin(θ)dθ dϕ Therefore, the LHS of the above Gauss’ Law equation is ∯▒〖Ε ⃗∙ds ⃗ 〗=Ε ⃗∯▒〖ds ⃗ 〗 =E(r,θ) ∫0^(ϕ_0)▒〖∫(r_a)^(r_b)▒〖r^2 sin(θ) 〗 dθ dϕ〗 =E(r,θ) r^2 ϕ_0 (cos(r_a )-cos(r_b ) ) In the above equation, I assume that E(r,θ) is the electric field for a specific r and θ within that infinitesimally small differential area, ds ⃗, for simplicity. The integral when then calculated using Mathematica.
For the RHS of the above equation, we can use the surface charge density, ρ_s, on the positive electrode to calculate Q_enclosed. Q_enclosed=ρ_s×(surface area of cone) =ρ_s×∫0^(ϕ_0)▒〖∫(r_a)^(r_b)▒〖r sin(θ_+ ) 〗 dr dϕ〗 =ρ_s ((r_b^2-r_a^2)/2) ϕ_0 sin(θ_+ ) This was calculated using Mathematica. Steps taken as similar to those seen in this online source.
Therefore, we now have ∯▒〖Ε ⃗∙ds ⃗ 〗=Q_enclosed/ϵ_0 Ε ⃗ r^2 ϕ_0 (cos(r_a )-cos(r_b ) )=(ρ_s ((r_b^2-r_a^2)/2) ϕ_0 sin(θ_+ ))/ϵ_0 Ε ⃗=(ρ_s ((r_b^2-r_a^2)/2) ϕ_0 sin(θ_+ ))/(ϵ_0 r^2 ϕ_0 (cos(r_a )-cos(r_b ) ) ) a ̂_r a ̂_θ
Solution
Your analysis of the electric field in a conical capacitor is well-structured, but there are some points to clarify and verify:
-
Electric Field Expression: Your expression for the electric field assumes radial symmetry, which might not hold true given the geometry. Since there is no radial symmetry, ensure that is accurately represented with respect to both and . The expression you wrote, , may need refinement to account for angular dependence.
-
Surface Charge Density: When calculating , confirm that the surface charge density is indeed uniform across the conical surface. If it varies, this could affect your results.
-
Integration Limits: The limits for the integral involving seem to be correctly chosen, but check that the angle corresponds properly to the geometry of the electrodes. Ensure that you have the correct bounds for the surface area calculation.
-
Electric Flux Calculation: When integrating , ensure that your differential area element matches the geometry of the Gaussian surface. It should account for the varying radius in cylindrical coordinates, as your current formulation assumes a constant distance.
-
Final Electric Field Equation: The final electric field equation should correctly include any necessary angular components, and it seems you might be implying a dependence on both and in the final result. Check the normalization factor to ensure consistency with units, as the electric field should be in volts per meter (V/m).
Suggested Adjustments:
- Ensure that the electric field is presented as if there’s angular dependence.
- Revisit the integration of to ensure that it reflects the conical geometry accurately.
Questions to Consider:
- How does the variation of affect your calculations of ?
- Have you considered numerical methods for validating the integral results from Mathematica?
- Could there be additional geometric factors (like dielectric constants) affecting the electric field that should be considered?
- What implications does the azimuthal symmetry have on the electric field distribution across the conical capacitor?
- Have you explored the behavior of the electric field as a function of distance from the apex to the base of the cone?
Tip:
When dealing with complex geometries, visualizing the problem with sketches or diagrams can often clarify the relationships between various parameters and aid in formulating the correct mathematical expressions.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Electromagnetism
Vector Calculus
Gauss's Law
Formulas
D = ε₀ E
∯ E · ds = Q_enclosed / ε₀
Theorems
Gauss's Law
Suitable Grade Level
College Level
Related Recommendation
Simplifying Electric Field Expression in Conical Capacitor
Deriving the Electric Field in a Conical Capacitor Using Gauss's Law
Voltage Derivation in Conical Capacitors with Electric Fields
Finding Capacitance of a Conical Capacitor: Equations and Solutions
Calculating Voltage in a Conical Capacitor from Electric Field