To prove that:

$\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{k}{i} = \binom{n+1}{i+1}$

using a combinatorial argument, we need to show that both sides count the same quantity in different ways. Let's break it down.

Left-hand side: $\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{k}{i}$

We can interpret $\binom{k}{i}$ as the number of ways to choose $i$ objects from $k$ objects. So, the sum $\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{k}{i}$ represents the total number of ways to choose $i$ objects from any of the sets of size $k$, where $k$ ranges from 0 to $n$.

But we need to find a suitable combinatorial problem that the sum counts directly.

Right-hand side: $\binom{n+1}{i+1}$

The term $\binom{n+1}{i+1}$ counts the number of ways to choose $i+1$ objects from a set of $n+1$ objects. So now we look for a way to relate this counting problem to the left-hand side.

Combinatorial interpretation

Consider a set $S$ with $n+1$ elements, say $S = \{1, 2, 3, \dots, n+1\}$. We want to count the number of ways to select $i+1$ elements from this set.

Now, suppose we label one element of the set as "special" (say, the element $n+1$), and count the number of ways to select $i+1$ elements based on whether or not the "special" element is included.

1. Case 1: The "special" element $n+1$ is included.

   In this case, we need to choose $i$ elements from the remaining $n$ elements (i.e., from $\{1, 2, \dots, n\}$). The number of ways to do this is $\binom{n}{i}$.

2. Case 2: The "special" element $n+1$ is not included.

   In this case, we need to choose all $i+1$ elements from the remaining $n$ elements. The number of ways to do this is $\binom{n}{i+1}$.

Therefore, the total number of ways to select $i+1$ elements from a set of $n+1$ elements is the sum of these two cases:

$\binom{n+1}{i+1} = \binom{n}{i+1} + \binom{n}{i}.$

This argument can be extended for summing over all possible $k$, leading to:

$\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{k}{i} = \binom{n+1}{i+1}.$

Thus, both sides count the same thing: the number of ways to choose $i+1$ elements from a set of $n+1$ elements, and we have proven the identity.

Would you like to explore this further, or discuss a different combinatorial argument?

---

Here are some related questions for deeper understanding:

1. Can you find another identity involving binomial coefficients using a similar combinatorial argument?
2. How does Pascal’s identity relate to this problem?
3. Can you generalize this identity for sums involving different powers of binomial coefficients?
4. How would you interpret the sum if $i$ is greater than $n$?
5. What other combinatorial identities involve summing over binomial coefficients?

Tip: Combinatorial proofs are often powerful because they offer intuitive insight into abstract algebraic identities. Try breaking problems into cases to uncover deeper relationships.