Math Problem Statement
can you solve with master theorem the following recurrence? T(2^n) = T(2^(n-1))+2^n
Solution
We have the recurrence relation:
Step 1: Change Variables
Let , so that . Rewriting the recurrence in terms of :
This is now in the standard recurrence form:
where:
- ,
- .
Step 2: Apply the Master Theorem
The Master Theorem applies to recurrences of the form:
where:
- ,
- ,
- .
Now, we compare with .
Since grows asymptotically faster than , we use Case 3 of the Master Theorem, which states that if for some , and if the regularity condition holds ( for some and sufficiently large ), then:
Since (where ), and the regularity condition holds, we conclude:
Conclusion
Since we initially substituted , we get:
Would you like a more detailed breakdown of any step?
Related Questions:
- How does the Master Theorem apply to different forms of recurrence relations?
- What are the conditions for using each of the three Master Theorem cases?
- How do we verify the regularity condition in Case 3 of the Master Theorem?
- How does changing variables help in solving recurrence relations?
- What are some real-world applications of recurrence relations in algorithms?
Tip: The Master Theorem is great for divide-and-conquer recurrences, but it doesn’t work for all cases (e.g., when subproblems have varying sizes).
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Recurrence Relations
Master Theorem
Logarithms
Formulas
T(N) = aT(N/b) + f(N)
N^log_b a
T(N) = Θ(f(N))
Theorems
Master Theorem (Case 3)
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 10-12