Math Problem Statement
Show that there exists a sequence of rational numbers rn for which |r^2_n − 2| → 0. (Hint: One possibility is to consider the classical iteration for approximating square roots, here given by r_(n+1) = 1/2 (r_n + 2/r_n). Think about why this would work, but also feel free to think of other schemes.) try taking a ratio between successive terms of the sequence and see if u can bound it by anything
Solution
We are tasked with showing that there exists a sequence of rational numbers such that , meaning that the sequence of rational numbers converges to the square root of 2. We are given a classical iterative formula:
Step 1: Understanding the Iterative Formula
This is a classical method known as the Newton-Raphson method for finding square roots. The sequence defined by this iteration should converge to . To understand why this is the case, let's explore the iteration in more detail.
- Let . We are seeking the root of , i.e., .
- The Newton-Raphson method gives the iterative formula:
This matches the formula we are given. Therefore, the iteration should converge to if it starts with a rational .
Step 2: Convergence of the Sequence
We want to show that , i.e., . To do this, we can examine the error in the approximation at each step. Define the error . Our goal is to show that .
-
Error expression: First, observe that:
-
Relation between successive terms: Let’s try to bound the ratio between successive terms of the sequence. We compute in terms of :
Squaring both sides:
Therefore:
This expression shows how the error at step , , depends on the error at step , .
-
Bounding the error: If is sufficiently close to , the term will be small. Since , the term , and the fraction approaches 2. This gives us:
We see that the error decreases quadratically as , implying that as .
Step 3: Conclusion
The iteration defined by
will converge to , and the error will tend to 0 as . Hence, we have shown that there exists a sequence of rational numbers such that .
Next Steps and Further Investigation:
- Can we establish a formal rate of convergence for this method?
- What happens if we start with irrational initial conditions? Does it still converge to ?
- Can this method be generalized to approximate other square roots?
- Can we find a simpler sequence that converges to ?
- How does this method compare with other methods for approximating square roots?
Tip: Newton’s method converges quadratically, meaning the number of correct digits approximately doubles with each step once the approximation is close enough. This makes it a very efficient method for numerical computation.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Algebra
Numerical Methods
Rational Sequences
Convergence
Square Roots
Formulas
r_(n+1) = (1/2) * (r_n + 2/r_n)
r^2_n − 2 = e_n
r_(n+1)^2 = (1/4) * (r_n + 2/r_n)^2
Theorems
Newton-Raphson Method
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate Mathematics
Related Recommendation
Finding Square Root of 2 Using Newton-Raphson Method
Evaluating Square Root of 12 Using Newton-Raphson Method to Four Decimal Places
Understanding the Square Root of 2 and Its Applications
Sequence Ratio Approximation Using Convergence in Numerical Methods
Understanding the Square Root of 2 (√2): Irrational Number and Geometric Significance