The given expression is a quantified statement involving two quantifiers: the universal quantifier (∀) and the existential quantifier (∃). Let’s break down the meaning of the expression:

Expression:

$(\forall x)(\exists y) \; x \cdot y = 1$

Translation:

• ∀x: "For all $x$", meaning this statement must hold for every possible value of $x$.
• ∃y: "There exists $y$", meaning for each $x$, there must be at least one value of $y$ that satisfies the condition.

Meaning:

For every value of $x$, there exists a corresponding $y$ such that the product of $x$ and $y$ equals 1.

Interpretation:

This is essentially stating that for every $x$, there is a $y$ such that:

$x \cdot y = 1$

For this to be true, $y$ would be the multiplicative inverse of $x$. In other words, for each $x$, the $y$ that satisfies the equation is:

$y = \frac{1}{x}$

Exception:

There is an important exception to note. If $x = 0$, there is no real number $y$ such that $0 \cdot y = 1$, since multiplying any number by zero results in zero, not one. Therefore, this expression does not hold for $x = 0$.

Thus, the statement can be interpreted as true for all nonzero real numbers, but it fails for $x = 0$ in the context of real numbers.

---

Would you like a more detailed exploration of this topic, or do you have any questions?

Here are 5 related questions to expand on this:

1. What is the multiplicative inverse of a number?
2. How does this statement behave in different number systems (e.g., integers, complex numbers)?
3. What would happen if we added restrictions, like $x > 0$?
4. What is the difference between existential and universal quantifiers in logic?
5. Can this equation hold in modular arithmetic systems?

Tip: The universal quantifier (∀) always needs to account for every possible element in the domain, so always check for exceptions like $x = 0$ when dealing with multiplication.