Recall the defintion of inverse functions, we’ll do something similar (but simpler) for relations.
Let R be a relation on the set A. The relation R−1 is obtained from R by reversing every ordered
pair. That is, R−1 = {(y, x) : (x, y) ∈ R}.
Prove that if R is transitive then R−1 is also transitive.

To prove that if a relation \( R \) on a set \( A \) is transitive, then the inverse relation \( R^{-1} \) is also transitive, we begin by recalling the definitions of transitivity and inverse relations.

### Definitions:
1. **Transitivity**: A relation \( R \) is transitive if whenever \( (x, y) \in R \) and \( (y, z) \in R \), it follows that \( (x, z) \in R \).
   
   Symbolically, \( R \) is transitive if:
   \[
   (x, y) \in R \text{ and } (y, z) \in R \implies (x, z) \in R.
   \]

2. **Inverse relation**: For a relation \( R \), the inverse relation \( R^{-1} \) is defined as:
   \[
   R^{-1} = \{(y, x) : (x, y) \in R\}.
   \]

We aim to show that if \( R \) is transitive, then \( R^{-1} \) is also transitive.

### Proof:

Let \( R \) be a transitive relation on a set \( A \).

Consider the inverse relation \( R^{-1} \). To show that \( R^{-1} \) is transitive, we need to prove the following:  
For any \( a, b, c \in A \),
\[
(a, b) \in R^{-1} \text{ and } (b, c) \in R^{-1} \implies (a, c) \in R^{-1}.
\]

#### Step 1: Assume \( (a, b) \in R^{-1} \) and \( (b, c) \in R^{-1} \).

By the definition of inverse relations:
- \( (a, b) \in R^{-1} \) means \( (b, a) \in R \).
- \( (b, c) \in R^{-1} \) means \( (c, b) \in R \).

#### Step 2: Use the transitivity of \( R \).

Since \( (b, a) \in R \) and \( (c, b) \in R \), and \( R \) is transitive, it follows that:
\[
(c, a) \in R.
\]

#### Step 3: Apply the definition of inverse relations again.

Since \( (c, a) \in R \), by the definition of \( R^{-1} \), this implies:
\[
(a, c) \in R^{-1}.
\]

#### Conclusion:

We have shown that if \( (a, b) \in R^{-1} \) and \( (b, c) \in R^{-1} \), then \( (a, c) \in R^{-1} \). Therefore, \( R^{-1} \) is transitive.

Thus, if \( R \) is transitive, then its inverse relation \( R^{-1} \) is also transitive, as required.

---

Would you like further details or clarification? Here are five questions to explore this topic further:

1. Can a relation be transitive but its inverse not be transitive?
2. What are some examples of transitive and non-transitive relations?
3. How does symmetry of a relation relate to its transitivity?
4. If \( R^{-1} \) is transitive, is \( R \) necessarily transitive?
5. Can the composition of a relation with its inverse lead to a transitive relation?

**Tip**: Understanding the difference between relations and functions helps in visualizing how properties like transitivity apply to both.

Recall the definition of inverse functions, we’ll do something similar (but simpler) for relations. Let R be a relation on the set A. The relation R−1 is obtained from R by reversing every ordered pair. That is, R−1 = {(y, x) : (x, y) ∈ R}. Prove that if R is transitive then R−1 is also transitive.

Learn how to prove that if a relation R on a set A is transitive, then its inverse relation R−1 is also transitive. This problem covers key concepts in set theory, including transitivity and inverse relations, suitable for undergraduate students.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation