Math Problem Statement

Denote by χ(G) the chromatic number of a graph G. Let G be a graph with no 3-cycle. Let e1 and e2 be two distinct edges of G with a common end-vertex. Let H = G − {e1, e2} be the spanning subgraph of G obtained from G by deleting e1 and e2. Prove that χ(G) − 1 ≤ χ(H) ≤ χ(G).

Solution

To prove the given inequality χ(G)1χ(H)χ(G)\chi(G) - 1 \leq \chi(H) \leq \chi(G), we need to show two things:

  1. χ(H)χ(G)\chi(H) \leq \chi(G)
  2. χ(G)1χ(H)\chi(G) - 1 \leq \chi(H)

Let's start by understanding what each part means in the context of graph theory:

  • χ(G)\chi(G) is the chromatic number of GG, i.e., the minimum number of colors needed to color the vertices of GG such that no two adjacent vertices share the same color.
  • H=G{e1,e2}H = G - \{e1, e2\} is the graph obtained by deleting the edges e1e1 and e2e2 from GG.

Part 1: χ(H)χ(G)\chi(H) \leq \chi(G)

Since HH is obtained from GG by removing edges, the chromatic number of HH cannot be greater than that of GG. This is because removing edges can only reduce or maintain the number of required colors; it cannot increase it. Thus, if we can color GG with χ(G)\chi(G) colors, we can also color HH with at most χ(G)\chi(G) colors:

χ(H)χ(G)\chi(H) \leq \chi(G)

Part 2: χ(G)1χ(H)\chi(G) - 1 \leq \chi(H)

For this part, consider the structure of the graph GG and HH:

  • GG has no 3-cycles, which implies GG is triangle-free.
  • e1e1 and e2e2 are two distinct edges with a common end-vertex. Let this common vertex be vv, and let the other vertices connected by e1e1 and e2e2 be uu and ww, respectively. Thus, e1=(v,u)e1 = (v, u) and e2=(v,w)e2 = (v, w).

When we remove e1e1 and e2e2 to form HH, the vertex vv will have fewer connections in HH than in GG. This potentially reduces the constraints on coloring vv, but not necessarily the overall chromatic number of HH.

Let's argue by contradiction. Assume χ(H)<χ(G)1\chi(H) < \chi(G) - 1. This would imply that we can color HH with χ(G)2\chi(G) - 2 colors. But since HH is GG minus two edges, if we could color HH with χ(G)2\chi(G) - 2 colors, we could extend this coloring to GG by appropriately adjusting the colors of vertices uu, vv, and ww (since adding two edges back cannot force us to require two additional colors). This would contradict the definition of χ(G)\chi(G) as the minimum number of colors needed.

Therefore, it must be that removing the two edges reduces the chromatic number by at most one:

χ(G)1χ(H)\chi(G) - 1 \leq \chi(H)

Combining these results, we get the desired inequality:

χ(G)1χ(H)χ(G)\chi(G) - 1 \leq \chi(H) \leq \chi(G)

Would you like more details or have any questions?

Here are 5 questions you might want to ask next:

  1. How is the chromatic number of a graph determined?
  2. What are some common techniques for coloring a graph?
  3. Can you provide an example of finding the chromatic number of a specific graph?
  4. What is the significance of the chromatic number in graph theory?
  5. Are there any famous theorems related to graph coloring?

Tip: When solving graph theory problems, always consider how modifying the graph (e.g., adding or removing edges) affects properties like chromatic number and connectedness.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Graph Theory
Chromatic Number
Spanning Subgraph

Formulas

-

Theorems

-

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate