Math Problem Statement

Show that if (an)n∈N,(bn)n∈N are equivalent sequences, then (an)n∈N is Cauchy if and only if (bn)n∈N is Cauchy

Solution

We are tasked with showing that if two sequences (an)nN(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} and (bn)nN(b_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} are equivalent sequences, then (an)nN(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} is Cauchy if and only if (bn)nN(b_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} is Cauchy.

Definitions:

  1. Equivalent sequences: Two sequences (an)(a_n) and (bn)(b_n) are said to be equivalent if: limnanbn=0.\lim_{n \to \infty} |a_n - b_n| = 0. This means that as nn \to \infty, the terms of the two sequences become arbitrarily close to each other.

  2. Cauchy sequence: A sequence (an)(a_n) is called a Cauchy sequence if for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists an integer NN such that for all m,n>Nm, n > N, anam<ϵ.|a_n - a_m| < \epsilon. This means that the terms of the sequence become arbitrarily close to each other as nn and mm grow large.

Proof Outline:

We aim to prove that:

  • If (an)(a_n) is Cauchy, then (bn)(b_n) is also Cauchy, and vice versa.

Direction 1: If (an)(a_n) is Cauchy, then (bn)(b_n) is Cauchy.

Assume (an)(a_n) is a Cauchy sequence. This means that for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists N1NN_1 \in \mathbb{N} such that for all m,n>N1m, n > N_1, anam<ϵ3.|a_n - a_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{3}. Since (an)(a_n) and (bn)(b_n) are equivalent, we have: limnanbn=0.\lim_{n \to \infty} |a_n - b_n| = 0. So, for this ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists N2NN_2 \in \mathbb{N} such that for all n>N2n > N_2, anbn<ϵ3.|a_n - b_n| < \frac{\epsilon}{3}. Similarly, for all m>N2m > N_2, ambm<ϵ3.|a_m - b_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{3}.

Now, for all m,n>max(N1,N2)m, n > \max(N_1, N_2), we can estimate bnbm|b_n - b_m| using the triangle inequality: bnbmbnan+anam+ambm.|b_n - b_m| \leq |b_n - a_n| + |a_n - a_m| + |a_m - b_m|. Using the bounds we established earlier: bnbm<ϵ3+ϵ3+ϵ3=ϵ.|b_n - b_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{3} + \frac{\epsilon}{3} + \frac{\epsilon}{3} = \epsilon. Thus, (bn)(b_n) is also a Cauchy sequence.

Direction 2: If (bn)(b_n) is Cauchy, then (an)(a_n) is Cauchy.

The proof for this direction is analogous to the first direction. Assume (bn)(b_n) is a Cauchy sequence. Then for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists N3NN_3 \in \mathbb{N} such that for all m,n>N3m, n > N_3, bnbm<ϵ3.|b_n - b_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{3}. Since (an)(a_n) and (bn)(b_n) are equivalent, there exists N4NN_4 \in \mathbb{N} such that for all n>N4n > N_4, anbn<ϵ3.|a_n - b_n| < \frac{\epsilon}{3}. Similarly, for all m>N4m > N_4, ambm<ϵ3.|a_m - b_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{3}.

Now, for all m,n>max(N3,N4)m, n > \max(N_3, N_4), using the triangle inequality again: anamanbn+bnbm+bmam.|a_n - a_m| \leq |a_n - b_n| + |b_n - b_m| + |b_m - a_m|. Using the bounds we established: anam<ϵ3+ϵ3+ϵ3=ϵ.|a_n - a_m| < \frac{\epsilon}{3} + \frac{\epsilon}{3} + \frac{\epsilon}{3} = \epsilon. Thus, (an)(a_n) is also a Cauchy sequence.

Conclusion:

Since we have shown both directions, we conclude that if (an)(a_n) and (bn)(b_n) are equivalent sequences, then (an)(a_n) is Cauchy if and only if (bn)(b_n) is Cauchy.


Would you like more details or have any questions?

Here are five related questions for further exploration:

  1. How do equivalent sequences behave with respect to limits?
  2. Can two equivalent sequences converge to different limits?
  3. What is an example of two sequences that are equivalent but not identical?
  4. How do Cauchy sequences relate to convergent sequences in metric spaces?
  5. Can a sequence be Cauchy but not converge in every space?

Tip: In any metric space, every Cauchy sequence converges if the space is complete.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Real Analysis
Cauchy Sequences
Equivalent Sequences
Limits

Formulas

Definition of Cauchy Sequence: |a_n - a_m| < ε for all m, n > N
Definition of Equivalent Sequences: lim (n -> ∞) |a_n - b_n| = 0

Theorems

Cauchy Criterion
Triangle Inequality

Suitable Grade Level

College-level (Real Analysis)