Math Problem Statement
Solution
Let's fill in the blanks for the proof in Problem 9 based on the information provided and the typical structure of this proof.
Given Information:
- Theorem 1 states that if is a natural number, then , meaning and are coprime.
- Theorem 2 provides a criterion for an infinite set: if for each finite subset of a set , there exists an element such that , then is infinite.
- Theorem 3 is the statement we need to prove, that there are infinitely many prime numbers.
Proof Outline with Filled Blanks:
Let's proceed step-by-step and fill each blank in the proof.
-
Let be the set of prime numbers.
- This is the set of all primes, which we are trying to show is infinite.
-
Let be a finite subset of the set . Denote the elements of by and let .
- Here, we consider a finite subset of prime numbers and define as the product of all primes in .
-
By Theorem 1, and are coprime.
- According to Theorem 1, (product of primes in ) and are coprime.
-
So there is at least one prime number that divides but not .
- There must be a prime factor of that is not in the original set , because is not divisible by any of the primes in .
-
Let's call this prime number . Because does not divide , we have that is not an element of .
- This new prime divides , proving that there is always a prime not in .
-
So we have shown that for any finite set of prime numbers , we can find another prime number that is not in the set . Thus, by Theorem 2, we have that is infinite.
- By Theorem 2, since we can always find a new prime outside any finite subset, the set of primes must be infinite.
Final Answer for Each Blank:
- = prime numbers.
- = finite subset.
- coprime.
- divides.
- not.
- infinite.
Would you like additional details on any part of this proof or have any questions?
Here are some related questions to expand your understanding:
- Why is guaranteed to have a prime factor not in ?
- How does Theorem 2 guarantee the infiniteness of ?
- Can you explain why and are coprime for any finite set ?
- What would happen if there were only finitely many primes?
- How does this proof relate to Euclid’s original proof of the infiniteness of primes?
Tip: When proving a set is infinite, demonstrating that new elements can always be found outside any finite subset is often a strong approach.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Number Theory
Prime Numbers
Infinity of Primes
Set Theory
Formulas
gcd(b, b+1) = 1 (coprime property)
q = p1 * p2 * ... * pn
Theorems
Theorem 1: gcd(b, b+1) = 1
Theorem 2: Infinite set criterion
Euclid's Theorem on the Infinitude of Primes
Suitable Grade Level
College Level (Undergraduate)