Math Problem Statement
A Θ-graph consists of three internally vertex-disjoint paths joining two vertices (because such a graph looks like Θ). To obtain the maximum size of a graph with order n and no Θ-subgraphs, consider such a graph G such that it has a blocks which are isomorphic to K2 and b blocks which are cycles. Express n and the size m of G in terms of a, b and the lengths of such cycles. Derive an upper bound on m and show that this bound can be achieved. Answer. If n is odd, then the maximum number of edges in an n-vertex graph with no Θ-subgraphs is 23 (n − 1). What is the answer for even n?
Solution
To derive the maximum size of a graph with order and no -subgraphs, let's start with the definitions and assumptions provided.
Definitions and Initial Setup
- A -graph consists of three internally vertex-disjoint paths joining two vertices.
- Graph has blocks which are isomorphic to and blocks which are cycles.
- Let the lengths of these cycles be .
Expression of and in Terms of , , and Cycle Lengths
Each block contributes 2 vertices and 1 edge:
- There are vertices contributed by the blocks.
- There are edges from these blocks.
Each cycle (of length ) contributes vertices and edges:
- There are vertices contributed by the cycles.
- There are edges from these cycles.
The total number of vertices is:
The total number of edges is:
Upper Bound on
To obtain an upper bound on , let's consider the constraints imposed by the absence of -subgraphs. A graph without -subgraphs cannot have any two vertices connected by more than two internally vertex-disjoint paths. This limitation affects how we construct the blocks.
Constructing the Graph for Maximum
One way to construct such a graph while maximizing the number of edges is to use cycles and blocks in a specific arrangement.
Case for Odd
For odd , it has been derived that:
Case for Even
For even , we need to consider a slightly different construction to avoid -subgraphs while maximizing edges.
If is even, let's denote where is an integer. The maximum number of edges can be obtained by forming a cycle of length .
Constructing the Cycle
Consider a single cycle of length (i.e., all vertices forming one big cycle). This avoids the -subgraphs and maximizes the number of edges:
Therefore, for even :
Conclusion
For odd , the maximum number of edges in an -vertex graph with no -subgraphs is:
For even , the maximum number of edges in an -vertex graph with no -subgraphs is:
This bound can be achieved by forming a single cycle of length for even .
Do you want details or have any questions?
Here are 5 numbered questions you could ask:
- How do you construct a -free graph for odd ?
- Can you explain why cycles avoid -subgraphs?
- How would the construction change if self-loops were allowed?
- Can this method be extended to hypergraphs?
- What are the implications of this result in graph theory?
Tip: When dealing with combinatorial structures, always check for forbidden configurations to simplify problem-solving strategies.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Graph Theory
Cycle Graphs
Maximal Edge Graphs
Formulas
Maximum number of edges in a graph without Θ-subgraphs
Theorems
-
Suitable Grade Level
Advanced Undergraduate
Related Recommendation
Maximum Edges in Graph with n Vertices and n - 2 Components
Maximum Number of Edges in a Graph with n Vertices and n-2 Components
Proof: Maximum Number of Edges in a Simple Graph with n Vertices
Understanding Graph Theory Problems: Analyzing Vertices, Edges, and Connectivity
Minimum k in a 5-Regular Graph of Order 20 with Distance 2