Math Problem Statement
¬(p∨q)∧¬(p∧q)≡¬(p∨q)
Solution
To determine if the given logical equivalence is true, we will simplify both sides of the equation.
The given equation is:
We'll simplify both sides step by step.
Left Side:
-
Distribute (NOT) using De Morgan's laws:
-
Substitute these back into the left side:
-
Distribute (AND):
Simplify to:
So, the left side simplifies to:
Right Side:
Using De Morgan's laws, the right side simplifies to:
Comparison
Since both sides simplify to , the given equivalence is true.
Conclusion
This logical equivalence holds true.
Would you like more details or have any questions?
Here are 8 related questions to explore further:
- What is De Morgan's law in logic?
- How do you simplify logical expressions using truth tables?
- What is the difference between conjunction and disjunction in logic?
- Can you show an example of simplifying a complex logical expression?
- How do you use logical equivalences to prove logical statements?
- What are some common logical fallacies and how can they be avoided?
- How do you represent logical expressions in set theory?
- What are the applications of Boolean algebra in computer science?
Tip: When working with logical expressions, always remember to apply De Morgan's laws and distribution rules accurately to simplify the expressions correctly.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Logic
Boolean Algebra
Formulas
De Morgan's Laws
Theorems
-
Suitable Grade Level
Advanced High School
Related Recommendation
Proving Logical Equivalence: ¬(p ∨ (¬p ∧ q)) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q
Logical Equivalence of ∼[(p ∨ r) → ∼(p ∨ q)] Explained
Prove Logical Equivalence Using De Morgan's Laws Without a Truth Table
Simplify Logical Expression ¬(¬p ∨ r) → (q → p), q → (p ∨ r)
Truth Table for Propositional Logic (p ∨ (∼p ∨ q)) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼r)