Math Problem Statement
Solution
The problem shown is asking to compute the limit:
Let's work through this step by step:
Step 1: Substitute directly
First, let's substitute into the expression:
Substitute into the numerator and denominator:
Step 2: Check the result
After substituting , we find that the denominator becomes 0, while the numerator becomes 351. This means the expression is approaching infinity (since you have a non-zero number divided by zero). Therefore, the limit does not exist because the function approaches infinity as approaches 13.
Conclusion:
The correct answer is Option B: The limit does not exist.
Would you like more details on this? Also, here are 5 related questions you could explore:
- What happens when both the numerator and the denominator approach zero?
- How do we handle limits when the expression tends towards infinity?
- What is the concept of limits in calculus and why are they important?
- Can we apply L'Hopital's Rule to limits like this? Why or why not?
- What are vertical asymptotes and how do they relate to limits?
Tip: When evaluating limits, always check if direct substitution leads to indeterminate forms like or , which may require further steps like factoring or using L'Hopital's Rule.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Limits
Infinity
Indeterminate Forms
Formulas
Direct substitution in limits
Simplification of rational expressions
Theorems
Limit Theorem for Direct Substitution
Concept of Limits Approaching Infinity
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 11-12
Related Recommendation
Limit of Rational Function as x Approaches 1 from the Right
Limit of Rational Function 9x^6 − x / x^3 + 8 as x Approaches Infinity
Limit of a Rational Function Involving Square Roots as x Approaches Infinity
Evaluating Limits Involving Rational Functions as t -> ∞
Evaluating Limits of Rational Functions - lim x→-1 (x^2 + 2)/(x + 3) and lim x→4 (x^2 - 16)/(x - 4)